Union Planters Deposit Runoff Not So Bad at Second Glance

By Whiteman, Louis | American Banker, January 5, 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Union Planters Deposit Runoff Not So Bad at Second Glance


Whiteman, Louis, American Banker


Union Planters Corp. has lost about 12% of its St. Louis deposits, most of which it got in the 1998 acquisition of Magna Group Inc., according to company figures.

The Memphis-based company, which established itself as a major player in St. Louis when it bought Magna in July 1998, currently has about $2.7 billion of deposits in the market. At yearend 1998 it had almost $3.1 billion there.

But analysts seem unconcerned by the runoff, though they've frequently dumped on other banks that have suffered such losses after a merger. The difference here seems to be in the reasons for the loss: A third of it is attributable to an accounting change and the rest to efforts to get rid of high-priced certificates of deposit.

And it helps that, unlike other bank companies that failed to retain acquired deposits, Union Planters does not expect this runoff to cut into earnings. In fact, the company's St. Louis operations increased its return on equity by 10 percentage points, to 26%, in 1999, and its return on assets from 1.1% to 1.8%, largely because some of those deposits are gone.

Michael Ross, president and chief executive officer of the bank's 44-branch St. Louis operation, said that most of the attrition came from certificates of deposit that were priced as high as 150 basis points above the market rate, and was expected.

"Our checking and savings balances haven't really changed," he said. "We were expecting a good amount of the erosion in the CDs, but I am glad to see we are keeping the other accounts."

Many of the high-priced accounts were crippling Union Planters' ability to generate strong earnings, he said. Some of the deposit customers lost were local municipalities that were paid high interest rates on their funds even though the bank was restricted to reinvesting the money in low-yielding government securities.

The company did not have to replace the loans, Mr. Ross said, because Union Planters' allowed the division's loans to grow to 78% of deposits, up from Magna's loan to deposit ratio of 55% before the merger.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Union Planters Deposit Runoff Not So Bad at Second Glance
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?