Money and Its Economic and Social Functions: Simmel and European Monetary Integration

By Backhaus, Jurgen G. | The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, October 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Money and Its Economic and Social Functions: Simmel and European Monetary Integration

Backhaus, Jurgen G., The American Journal of Economics and Sociology


ABSTRACT. This essay tries to put Georg Simmel's The Philosophy of Money into the context of current monetary discussions in economics. Part I looks at the contribution of Georg Simmel in context and offers remarks about the changing structure of economics as a discipline composed of many different subdisciplines. It is argued that Simmel is able to transcend subdisciplinary borders, to great benefit for today's scholar. Part III explains Heinsohn and Steiger's recent contribution to monetary economics in terms of transactions and property rights; although the contribution has been made more in the context of post-Keynesian economics, this is the only way to comprehend and integrate it into the mainstream of scholarly discourse. This examination shows that Simmel's approach, transgressing interdisciplinary borders, has merits even today. Part IV looks at the perplexing phenomenon of European monetary integration with a similar interdisciplinary perspective in mind. In this case, it is not monetary economics b ut constitutional political economy which is the unifying concept to explain the peculiar features of European monetary integration.


Money and Its Economic and Social Functions [1]

IN ECONOMICS, WE TYPICALLY EMPHASIZE three functions of money: money as a unit of exchange; money as a unit of account; and money as a store of value. However, there are clearly other functions which money can perform in an economy and in society at large. The issue thus arises as to how to deal with the particularly economic functions just mentioned and with the other functions within the same theoretical framework or, if different theories have to be invoked, how to delineate those different theories from each other.

I would like to give a few examples here of other functions of money. During a demonstration against the regime of President Milosovic, the angry crowd in Belgrave threw Dinar bills onto the street near the presidential palace, protesting with a currency which, like the government, had lost the public's trust. Meanwhile, the printing presses of the central bank were turning out new bills with even higher denominations.

In Tehran recently we noticed the disdain with which people treat their money. There are now six thousand Rials to the U.S. Dollar, with the most common bill being a five thousand Rial note. However, people do not quote prices in Rials -- the population has developed a parlance in terms of its own denomination of ten Rials or one Tuman. In oral dealings, all prices are quoted in Tuman, as if the general population were collectively ashamed and engaged in a cover-up of the inflationary policies of its religious leaders and government. At the moment, the highest denomination is a bill of ten thousand Rials, an otherwise attractive (and big) bill; when I first saw it, I wondered bow I would feel as the head of state to have my portrait favourably depicted on such a worthless bill. [2] When routine transactions require carrying valises of money around, the stage is set for strong sentiments toward money.

These instances of anger, shame, and pride are not necessarily and closely related to the basic functions awarded money in economic theory -- its use as a unit of exchange, as a unit of account, and as a store of value -- although, of course, they somewhat refer to these three functions. The function of unit of exchange is clearly impaired if valises of money have to be carried around. [3] When the population changes the colloquial denomination on its own central bank, this is clear evidence for the loss of its function the currency has undergone as a unit of account. Throwing bills on the street in protest similarly reveals a complete disappearance of the function of store of value. Yet anger, shame, and pride, while connected to the basic functions of money depicted in economic theory, go far beyond those matters discussed in economics treaties, having eminently economic but also social and political repercussions.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Money and Its Economic and Social Functions: Simmel and European Monetary Integration


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?