Lawsuit Nets $72,000 for Illegal Immigrants

By Burn, Timothy | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), January 13, 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Lawsuit Nets $72,000 for Illegal Immigrants


Burn, Timothy, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


The Clinton administration is stepping up efforts to protect illegal-immigrant workers from discrimination and harassment by employers.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission last week reached a settlement on behalf of nine Mexican employees of a Minneapolis Holiday Inn Express who claimed their employer exploited them because they were in the country illegally.

The settlement came in a lawsuit filed by the EEOC on behalf of the workers. It was the first case in which the EEOC has sided with illegal immigrants who claimed discrimination by an employer.

EEOC officials said cases of employers exploiting illegal-immigrant workers are becoming more common and they are trying to stop the trend.

The nine workers, all housekeepers who said they were forced to work long hours and denied raises, will share a $72,000 settlement. But now they face deportation proceedings since their employer reported their status to the Immigration and Naturalization Service.

"We believe there is a problem out there, and if we tolerate any discrimination against these workers, we are undercutting the rights of all workers," said Ellen Vargas, an EEOC lawyer.

Signaling the new administration effort, the commission in October issued a "clarification" intended to remind both employers and employees that all workers, including illegal immigrants, are protected against discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

But advocates for tightening immigration in the United States said the Clinton administration's push to protect illegal workers has more to do with solidifying the Democrats' core base of labor and minorities.

"This EEOC plan is clearly an extension of the Democratic Party's objective of using immigration issues as a way to take back control of the Congress," said Dan Stein, executive director of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a Washington-based lobbying group.

"Without the substantial immigration that has taken place in this country since 1985, the Republican Party would have total control over Congress for the next few decades," he added.

But EEOC officials said they were simply trying to enforce existing law, which is intended to protect all workers.

While employment-discrimination cases often call for workers to be reinstated to their jobs, EEOC officials said they do not have the power to reinstate the workers in this instance since the hotel employees were working in the country illegally.

"Unauthorized workers are especially vulnerable to abuse and exploitation," said EEOC Chairman Ida L. Castro.

"It is imperative for employers to fully understand that discrimination against this class of employees will not be tolerated and that they will be responsible for appropriate remedies if they violate civil rights law," she said.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Lawsuit Nets $72,000 for Illegal Immigrants
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?