Justices Query Immunity Granted Hubbell

By Murray, Frank J. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), February 23, 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Justices Query Immunity Granted Hubbell

Murray, Frank J., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)

A poker-faced Webster L. Hubbell sat front and center yesterday while seven Supreme Court justices pressed government lawyers to justify using files to indict Mr. Hubbell after they were obtained under a pledge of immunity.

"The immunity that you gave him immunized nothing. If that was the case, wasn't there a certain deception involved?" asked Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a latecomer to the chorus of doubters who summed up questions from across the ideological spectrum.

"How rare is it to prosecute someone given such immunity?" asked Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

"It is relatively unusual but far from unheard of," replied Ronald J. Mann, a University of Michigan law professor representing the independent counsel's office, for which he is a consultant.

Justices' comments don't always indicate an outcome, but yesterday's were unusually explicit. Lawyers and justices alike said the outcome could set radical new rules for how investigators collect evidence, arrange an identification lineup and subpoena business records.

Justice Antonin Scalia said the independent counsel's approach would allow a prosecutor to subpoena a gun from the registered owner if he was a murder suspect, even if there was insufficient probable cause to get a search warrant.

"You can't make him tell where the gun is, but you can make him go and get it and give it to you?" Justice Scalia demanded of Mr. Mann.

"Yes," said Mr. Mann. "We can force him to turn over the key to a strongbox with the evidence, but can't force him to tell us the combination."

"Prosecutors all over the country would fall down dead if they thought they could subpoena guns or bloody underwear. It's just completely unthinkable," said Mr. Hubbell's lawyer, John W. Nields Jr. of Washington.

Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist remained noncommittal and probed both sides.

When Mr. Nields said immunity was granted to elicit truth, the chief justice said, "Surely he must tell the truth."

"Yes, but under an immunity order the government is expected to hold him safe from prosecution," Mr.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Justices Query Immunity Granted Hubbell


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?