Chinese Official Says No Secrets Were Stolen

By Price, Joyce Howard | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), March 19, 1999 | Go to article overview

Chinese Official Says No Secrets Were Stolen


Price, Joyce Howard, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


A senior Chinese diplomat yesterday denied reports that his country stole nuclear weapons technology from a U.S. laboratory, blaming a "Cold War mentality" in Washington for the scandal that has prompted FBI and Energy Department investigations. "They are sorry there is no more Soviet Union, and they don't know how to act," said He Yafei, a minister-counsel at the Chinese Embassy, referring to those accusing China of espionage at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in the 1980s to help modernize Chinese nuclear warheads.

"The Sino-U.S. relationship has become the victim of party politics in the United States."

But the State Department and the Pentagon quickly dismissed the denial.

"We believe that there was espionage, that secrets were transferred and this was hurtful to us," Pentagon spokesman Kenneth Bacon said. "We think it is very standard for countries to deny spying when it occurs."

The State Department said the United States remains "deeply concerned about reports of China's attempts to illegally acquire sensitive U.S. technology."

That concern is "shared widely by both branches, the executive and legislative branches of government, by both political parties," said James P. Foley, the deputy spokesman.

"There's no division there. The Chinese should not read our concern over espionage as a partisan matter or a matter that's manufactured by opponents of U.S.-China relations," he said. "This relationship is extremely important."

In a bid to counter daily news reports and political charges of Chinese theft of sensitive military technology, Mr. He held a news conference here at which he reiterated Beijing's view that the spying claims are false.

"The reports about a theft of U.S. military technology are completely unfounded and irresponsible," Mr. He said in China's first in-depth response to the reports.

"China's efforts to develop nuclear weapons are entirely its own, based on its own efforts.

"Chinese scientists are as intelligent and vigilant as American scientists - if not more clever. . . .

"During the Ming Dynasty [from 1368-1644] a scientist tried to launch a missile and lost his life."

Mr. He pointed to other reports in recent years that military technology had been leaked and said it was later proved these were normal, academic exchanges.

"I'm not going to name any names, but there are some people in the United States who don't want to see any progress in U.S.-China relations," Mr. He said. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Chinese Official Says No Secrets Were Stolen
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.