Perception of Classroom Environment in Hong Kong: Differences between Students in Junior and Senior Forms

By Cheng, Sheung-Tak | Adolescence, Winter 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Perception of Classroom Environment in Hong Kong: Differences between Students in Junior and Senior Forms

Cheng, Sheung-Tak, Adolescence


In Hong Kong secondary schools, students in the senior forms take competitive examinations to proceed to the next level, whereas those in the junior forms have to attend school regardless of their ability and motivation. It was hypothesized that this produces different classroom climates. To test this hypothesis, 602 Chinese secondary school students were administered the short version of the Classroom Environment Scale. Significant differences were found, varying by type of school, on the dimensions of Involvement, Task Orientation, Teacher Support, Competition, Order and Organization, Affiliation, Innovation, Rule Clarity, and Teacher Control. These findings are discussed.

School environment has been recognized as an important factor in academic performance, personal development, relationships among students and teachers, and students' mood, attitudes, and behaviors (e.g., Fraser, 1987; Fraser & Fisher, 1983; Moos, 1987; Waxman, 1991; Wright, Gallagher, & Lombardi, 1991). Due to differences in culture and educational systems, studies conducted in the West have little relevance for understanding the situation in Hong Kong (cf. Cheng, 1994; Li, 1995; Wong, 1993, 1995). Thus, the goal of the present study was to examine differences in perceived classroom climate between junior and senior form secondary school students in Hong Kong, using the short version (in Chinese) of the Classroom Environment Scale (CES; Moos & Trickett, 1974).

The assumption of the social climate approach, pioneered by Rudolph Moos, is that environments, like human beings, have features that can be assessed. The 90-item CES, for example, looks at classroom environment in terms of three broad domains comprising nine dimensions. The Relationship domain encompasses three dimensions: Involvement (student attentiveness and participation), Affiliation (student friendship and mutuality), and Teacher Support (teacher assistance and concern).

The Personal Growth domain contains two dimensions: Task Orientation (emphasis on completing planned activities) and Competition (for grades and recognition). The System Maintenance and Change domain includes four dimensions: Order and Organization (orderliness of student behaviors and class activities), Rule Clarity (the extent to which clear rules are established), Teacher Control (rule enforcement), and Innovation (the amount of unusual and varied learning activities).

To understand the rationale for comparing the environments of junior (Forms 1-3) and senior (Forms 4-7) classrooms, knowledge of some of the characteristics of Hong Kong's educational system is necessary. In Hong Kong, there are seven years of secondary school education and three years of university education. In chronological terms, Form i is equivalent to Grade 7 in the U.S. system, and Form 7 is equivalent to the college freshman year. All students are required to complete Form 3 regardless of academic ability or motivation. Forced to stay in school, some exhibit academic, emotional, and behavioral problems (Coalition for the Evaluation of Compulsory Education, 1991).

Students are channeled into different secondary schools on the basis of ability (measured by public examinations). Approximately 70% of Form 3 students progress to Form 4 on the basis of their school performance. An examination is held at the end of Form 5, and approximately 30% are selected for Form 6. There is another examination at the end of Form 7 for the purpose of determining eligibility for college. A substantial proportion of students have to change schools for Form 4 and an even larger proportion for Form 6, separating many from their friends. Thus, attempts to establish new friendships-in a competitive learning environment-might have to be repeated.

Based on these conditions, three hypotheses were postulated (derived with T. W. H. Li, to whom the author expresses gratitude). First, due to the competitive and syllabus-driven nature of the senior forms (with movement between schools common), students in these forms were expected to score higher on Competition, Involvement, and Task Orientation, but lower on Affiliation and Innovation, than were junior form students.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Perception of Classroom Environment in Hong Kong: Differences between Students in Junior and Senior Forms


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?