Exploring Repeated Sampling Techniques in Field-Rng Research

By Broughton, Richard S. | The Journal of Parapsychology, September 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Exploring Repeated Sampling Techniques in Field-Rng Research


Broughton, Richard S., The Journal of Parapsychology


ABSTRACT: Field-RNG experiments are a new type of psi experiment in which continuously running RNGs reportedly show increases in order (as measured by variance) in response to changes in the states of consciousness of individuals in small or large groups.

Some researchers have posited the existence of a "conscious field" which emanates from the group and alters the output of the RNG. Whether or not that is true, the underlying model is that something--the consciousness field or the individual consciousnesses of the group members--perturbs the RNG. If these consciousness field effects truly represent an influence on the RNG, then repeated sampling of essentially identical events should substantially increase the evidence of the effect.

Two exploratory studies using repeated sampling were conducted. One study involved operating a multiple-RNG device during the weekly broadcast of two popular television shows, "Seinfeld" and "ER." A second study examined data collected by nine RNGs operating as part of the Global Consciousness Project (GCP; http://noosphere.princeton.edu) over the repeated arrival of the 1999 New Year around the world. Also, a single-sample formal replication was undertaken using the finale of the Seinfeld series--a special broadcast accompanied by much media publicity--to test the feasibility of finding field effects with that program.

Data for the television show experiments was produced by five RIPP-type RNGs fitted in a single Apple II computer. Scores were converted to [z.sup.2] variance scores and summed across six-second periods.

During the Seinfeld finale an observer time-coded the program and commercial content. Data from the program segments yielded a [X.sup.2] = 4675.4, df = 4485, p = .023 confirming the predicted effect. Data from the commercial segments did not deviate from chance [X.sup.2] = 1529.1, df = 1510, p = .36. Matched control data also did not show departures from chance.

No time-coding of content was done in the repeated sampling investigations. Instead, it was expected that the accumulation of data should reflect the regular program periods in the way an evoked brain potential emerges from repeated sampling of EEG data.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Exploring Repeated Sampling Techniques in Field-Rng Research
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?