Accountability for Past Human Rights Violations: Contributions of the Inter-American Organs of Protection

By Mendez, Juan E.; Mariezcurrena, Javier | Social Justice, Winter 1999 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Accountability for Past Human Rights Violations: Contributions of the Inter-American Organs of Protection

Mendez, Juan E., Mariezcurrena, Javier, Social Justice


IN RECENT YEARS, THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION HAS BEEN largely shaped by the struggle of organizations in civil society to overcome the recurring cycle of impunity for the most egregious crimes committed in the exercise and abuse of authority. The detention of General Augusto Pinochet in London, for purposes of extradition to Spain, was a veritable leap forward in the development of tools for human rights protection. This stunning development forces jurists everywhere to rethink the proper balance between notions of sovereignty and nonintervention in internal affairs and effective ways to implement fundamental principles of humanity. It also greatly expands the debate over what states and the international community owe to victims of egregious abuse beyond the limited circles of the international human rights movement.

Before the Pinochet case, though, there were important developments in the struggle to overcome impunity, often inextricably linked to the transitions from authoritarian rule to democracy. In each society undergoing such a transition, the issue of how to deal with the legacy of past abuses has been high on the agenda of emerging democracies. As similar problems arise in other communities, experiments put in practice to date have been examined with great interest. In the few countries that have attempted to prosecute such crimes, heavy pressure from entrenched military elites has often been brought to bear. Even when such pressure is absent, invocations to a false "reconciliation" thinly disguise a business-as-usual attitude that serves to evade the course of justice. In the many countries where truth commissions have been appointed, a profound ethical and political debate has arisen over the value of criminal prosecutions -- often, though not necessarily always -- as opposed to truth-telling.

This essay focuses on efforts at accountability in Latin America, and specifically on the contributions of the Inter-American Commission and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights -- the bodies that implement international human rights law in the region -- to that struggle. The picture is complex. Undoubtedly, the most ingenious and promising initiatives to restore truth and justice and to overcome impunity are grounded on national realities and emanate from domestic organizations of civil society or from the will of national democratic leaders. Yet pioneering decisions by inter-American bodies have also inspired and given a solid legal footing to some of those enterprises. As described below, the presence of inter-American bodies is at times clearly discernible and even precedent setting, whereas in other areas they have been silent or clearly lag behind national institutions in the development of progressive legal principles.

The Phenomenon of Impunity and the Present Status of the Struggle to Overcome It

We refer here to impunity for the most egregious human rights crimes, such as extrajudicial execution, torture, and disappearances, when committed systematically or on a wide scale. Of course, many other crimes also go unpunished for one reason or another. In addition, many Latin Americans rightly decry the pervasiveness of impunity for other illegal actions committed by high officials, particularly acts of corruption. Our views apply only to impunity for the most serious human rights crimes because, in their regard, emerging principles of international law require their effective prosecution and punishment, disclosure of the facts, reparations to the victims, and an effort to cleanse the security forces of their perpetrators (Mendez, 1997a: 255 et seq.).

Our analysis refers to impunity for such crimes whether they result from de facto or de jure impunity. The former occurs when crimes are not investigated thoroughly, or are not prosecuted, simply because of a lack of will to do so by the officials in charge of institutions with specific duties in that regard.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Accountability for Past Human Rights Violations: Contributions of the Inter-American Organs of Protection


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?