Columbine Could Turn District's Political Tide

By Richardson, Valerie | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), April 10, 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Columbine Could Turn District's Political Tide

Richardson, Valerie, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)

LITTLETON, Colo. - Two weeks before the Columbine shooting, Tom Mauser and his family were eating dinner when his 15year-old son, Daniel, asked him an unexpected question.

"He said, `Dad, did you know there are loopholes in the Brady Bill?' Just like that - out of the clear blue sky," recalled Mr. Mauser. "To me, it was a real sign."

Within a few weeks, Daniel was dead, and Mr. Mauser's life had changed forever. A transportation manager who had never been involved in politics, he's now one of the nation's most visible gun-control advocates as the political-affairs director of Sane Alternatives to the Firearms Epidemic, known as SAFE/Colorado.

His story is uniquely tragic, but Mr. Mauser says there are more like him in Colorado's 6th Congressional District: voters who once were content to support candidates backed by the National Rifle Association but have had a change of heart since the April 20 massacre that left 15 dead.

He should know. "I went door to door with fliers to try to put pressure on our state representative," Mr. Mauser recalled. "I'd knock on the door and say, `I'm Tom Mauser and I want to close the gun-show loophole,' and they'd say, `You're right, I can't believe we can't get this done.' "

Such evidence may be purely anecdotal, but it's music to the ears of Democratic strategists. Needing to wrest just five seats from the Republicans to regain control of the House, the Democrats have targeted the Colorado 6th District as one of their best bets for a takeover. Their optimism is based in part on the strength of the gun issue in a community upended by an act of unimaginable violence.

"It's an opportunity for us. Districts like these are changing," said John Del Cecato, spokesman for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

It probably would take an event no less earth-shattering than Columbine for this district to elect a Democrat. Since the suburban Denver seat was created in 1982, only Republicans have filled it. Voter registration here heavily favors the GOP: 38 percent are Republican and 34 percent are independent, with Democrats holding just 27 percent of the electorate.

To capture the seat, the Democrats need unaffiliated voters to swing to the left. The candidate charged with luring those independents likely will be Ken Toltz, a businessman who probably has scared away any serious Democratic rivals by raising a hefty $250,000. He is willing to spend $1 million to defeat Republican Rep. Tom Tancredo, 54, a conservative freshman who won election in 1998 with the backing of the NRA.

Mr. Toltz, 43, began his campaign about five months before Columbine, but the deadly shooting has put the race into focus around public-safety issues. Mr. Toltz has blasted his opponent as a tool of the NRA, accusing him of trying to weaken existing gun-safety laws and protect firearms manufacturers from liability even as his constituents demand action to stop future Eric Harrises and Dylan Klebolds.

"I know people in the 6th District are very frustrated with their representation," said Mr. Toltz recently over coffee at Starbucks. "It really hit home when our community was so shaken, shaken to its core, and nothing has been done."

The irony here is that Colorado gun owners are even more frustrated with Mr. Tancredo. While Democrats attack him as a gun-slinging Neanderthal insensitive to his community's pain, Second Amendment groups are outraged over what they see as his political pandering to the gun-confiscation crowd.

His office has been flooded with angry mail from gun-rights advocates, while the state's largest and most conservative firearms organization, Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, held a protest outside a Tancredo fund-raiser in August.

At the heart of the unrest is Mr. Tancredo's vote in favor of the Juvenile Justice Bill, a gun-control package that came to the U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Columbine Could Turn District's Political Tide


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?