Butchering the Language We Misuse Some Words and Phrases So Often That Dictionaries Now Feed the Errors Back to Us

By Carr, Amy | Daily Herald (Arlington Heights, IL), February 1, 2000 | Go to article overview

Butchering the Language We Misuse Some Words and Phrases So Often That Dictionaries Now Feed the Errors Back to Us


Carr, Amy, Daily Herald (Arlington Heights, IL)


The first three paragraphs contain several questionable usages. Can you spot them? If not, read on and learn. If you CAN spot them, savor the smug superiority reserved for those who know the difference between right and wrong ... when it comes to language, anyway.

Everyone has their little grammar pet peeves.

All around us, people are literally butchering the language. It's enough to make a person nauseous.

Even worse, it seems dictionaries - presumably the last word on subjects such as these - are going right along with the masses. Could it be that the editors of these esteemed reference books really could care less about the state of the English language?

Actually, Michael Agnes, editor in chief of the Webster's New World Dictionary, says he could care less because, in fact, he cares a great deal. The notion that people might think he "couldn't" care less is not only disheartening, it's a gross misinterpretation of what Agnes and the dictionary are trying to do, he says.

"A good dictionary is the reporter of language use," Agnes says. "You tell what's going on in the community. You (as a journalist) may not like some of the things you have to report, such as crime. But you don't let your personal opinions intervene. Your job is to present reality and a good dictionary editor is very much the same."

Agnes may not like the fact that people say "could care less" when they mean "couldn't care less," but who is he to say all those people are wrong. Call him a victim of peer pressure, if you will, but Agnes defends his decision to include the "incorrect" phrase in the dictionary along with the following definition:

"Could care less - corruption of the phrase 'couldn't care less.' Informal. To feel the least possible degree of interest, sympathy."

Dictionaries are loaded with similar examples.

Take the word nauseous. Traditionally, it means "causing nausea," but editors like Agnes know that very few people who say "I feel nauseous" mean to imply that they make others sick. Rather than correct those individuals, dictionaries have simply adopted the new definition of the word.

Webster's acknowledges the preferred definition by including the following notation:

"Nauseous - 1. Causing nausea. 2. feeling nausea, nauseated: usage objected to by some."

To the people who say "could care less" and "I feel nauseous," such definitions serve as validation that they've been right all along. To others, the practice is maddening and just another reflection of the way our language continues to change - for better or worse.

As Oakton Community College's official "Dr. Grammar," Richard Francis Tracz hears language miscues every day. Sometimes he corrects the errors, but often he just grits his teeth.

Admittedly, Tracz, chairman of Oakton's English department, says it's more difficult to correct language errors when dictionaries endorse questionable practices like using a plural pronoun with a singular antecedent (e.g., Everybody should bring their lunch tomorrow.), so the grammar doctor chooses his battles wisely.

"There are certain things that are obvious errors," Tracz said, noting that the aforementioned example clearly is one of them. "I still think that's wrong. It's a matter of what is your pet peeve and how much will you tolerate."

Language love affair

Though it might not always be so obvious, Americans are surprisingly passionate about language.

The Internet is loaded with sites devoted to the topic, including many that call for certain words, or word usages, to be banned from our language entirely.

Some words, like "Y2K," and "high-tech," should get the boot for sheer overusage, many language enthusiasts argue. Whereas words such as "literally" and "hopefully" should be taboo until people learn to use them correctly again.

Then there are words that fall into both categories, like "millennium. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Butchering the Language We Misuse Some Words and Phrases So Often That Dictionaries Now Feed the Errors Back to Us
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.