Intermarriage among Italians: Some Regional Variations in Australia [*]

By Roy, Parimal; Hamilton M., Ian | Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Winter 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Intermarriage among Italians: Some Regional Variations in Australia [*]

Roy, Parimal, Hamilton M., Ian, Journal of Comparative Family Studies




This paper is part of a larger project on the prevalence of intermarriage in Australia based on an analysis of census data. The primary aim of the paper is to identify the extent of intermarriage between Italian-born migrants, people born in Australia and other birthplace groupings. The analysis focuses on the pattern of Italian intermarriage in Gippsland in order to demonstrate that the incidence differs from that in urban areas of Australia. Gippsland is a rural region in south-eastern Australia where the economy is based on brown coal power generation, a paper mill, timber extraction and dairying. Intermarriage in Gippsland will be compared with another rural area within the same state of Victoria and with the urban area of Melbourne. The rural area chosen for comparison with Gippsland was the statistical division of North East region in the state of Victoria. This area was selected because it contained a significant number of Italian immigrants who have been settled for a long period, primarily in the to bacco industry. In addition the state of Queensland, which has a high percentage of Italian immigrants, also in tobacco and sugar growing regions, was identified separately in the analyses. Cost considerations precluded the division of Queensland into rural and urban regions. Comparisons will also be made with intermarriage patterns among Italians in Melbourne, which has a long history of Italian settlement (Jones, 1967), and is the Australian city with the highest proportion of Italian immigrants.

The data on which the analysis is based were drawn from the 1986 Census and contain information regarding the age, birthplace and area of residence of adults identified from 3,377,082 households in all states and territories which reported two partners living in the household. The measure of ethnicity used was birthplace of partners, and the analysis focussed on variations in interethnic marriages. The special tabulations purchased from the Australian Bureau of Statistics did not allow for the identification of the second or subsequent generation of immigrants. This means that people born in Australia, whose parents were born overseas, are classified as Australian regardless of their ethnic origin or identification. Groups based on birthplace may contain a significant percentage of 'persons of mixed ancestry', as acknowledged by Lieberson and Waters (1985:43), and discussed by Price and Zubrzycki (1962a), Lampugnani and Travaglia (1994) and Roy and Hamilton (1997). Therefore the in-marriage rate will be unde restimated as a marriage between the Australian born children of parents from the same ethnic group will be classified as an Australian-Australian marriage, rather than an ethnic group-ethnic group marriage.

Changes in intermarriage patterns over time were estimated from the age grouping of partners which were coded into five groups each covering ten years from 20 years to 59 years with a separate group for all people aged 60 years and above. Assuming that age at marriage for the great majority of couples was between 20 and 29 years the data included couples marrying during the period from the late 1930s to the 1980s. Since the second World War there have been significant changes in the composition of the population in Australia and these have been accompanied by increased interaction among diverse groups of people. Therefore, because of interaction with the host society over a period of time, it is to be expected that there will be an increase in marriages between different cultural groups. Until the mid- 1960s Italian-born arrivals were the second largest group after the British. If the choice of a partner is affected by the degree to which culture is shared, then one would expect that the pattern of intermarr iage among Italians would vary by age and generation, and that in-marriage would be greater among the old and those in earlier generations, because for them ethnicity is more important in the selection of a partner than among the young and those in later generations.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Intermarriage among Italians: Some Regional Variations in Australia [*]


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?