Sex and the Peremptory Strike: An Empirical Analysis

By Hightower, Susan | Stanford Law Review, April 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Sex and the Peremptory Strike: An Empirical Analysis


Hightower, Susan, Stanford Law Review


INTRODUCTION

When the Supreme Court decided J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.(1) in 1994, extending equal protection in jury selection to gender, critics were quick to conclude that the Court had effectively killed off the venerable peremptory challenge. The peremptory had been ailing, some commentators believed, since the Court's decision eight years earlier in Batson v. Kentucky,(2) which for the first time limited a litigator's previously unfettered discretion to strike whomever she pleased, without explanation.

Building on the criticism of Batson, defenders of the traditional peremptory challenge needed to look no further than the Court's opinion in J.E.B. itself to find reason to worry. Although concurring with the 6-3 majority, Justice O'Connor noted that the decision was not "costless."(3) Justice Scalia's dissent went much further, warning that the decision would spawn a wave of collateral litigation attacking the use of peremptories, burdening the courts much more than Batson because every case could involve a gender-based claim while demographics should make race-based challenges less frequent.(4) Furthermore, Justice Scalia predicted that the Court would expand its holding in J.E.B. to numerous other categories of discrimination in jury selection.(5)

After the first five years of application by the courts, the fears about J.E.B.'s legacy appear to have been vastly overstated. A survey of decided cases revealed only twenty-three published cases throughout the entire U.S. federal and state court systems that were reversed as a result of J.E.B. violations. A total of twenty-seven cases were remanded for hearings based on a claim of gender discrimination during voir dire; among those, only two reported cases were reversed after the heating based on J.E.B.(6)

If attempts to comply with J.E.B. and prevent discrimination against women in jury service have thrown the court system into turmoil, it is not revealed in the case law. Indeed, it should be noted that Justice Blackmun's opinion in J.E.B. listed nine states that already had extended Batson to gender based on their own state constitutions, the U.S. Constitution, or both;(7) the Ninth Circuit also had done so, although three circuits had reached the contrary conclusion.(8) This made the change less sweeping than it might have been, though its impact has been disproportionate in states such as Alabama that had explicitly declined to extend Batson to gender before J.E.B.(9)

In this note, I will not trace the history of the peremptory strike or the Supreme Court's road to J.E.B.; nor will I analyze the Court's reasoning in the decision. Many commentators covered that ground in the immediate aftermath of the ruling.(10) Instead, this note is the first comprehensive analysis of J.E.B.'s impact during its first five years in practice.(11) Part I sketches the reasons legal analysts supported and opposed J.E.B., focusing on critics' fears about the decision's implementation. Part II details the results of my study of more than 450 state and federal cases interpreting J.E.B. Part III discusses the implications of these results and suggests further research.

I. FROM SIDESHOW TO MAIN EVENT

Once the Supreme Court eliminated the use of peremptory strikes based solely on race in Batson v. Kentucky,(12) some commentators proposed possible reforms of the use of peremptories,(13) while others advocated banning them entirely.(14) Meanwhile, some scholars called for the extension of Batson to gender. Particularly influential was Professor Barbara Allen Babcock's work, A Place in the Palladium: Women's Rights and Jury Service,(15) which Justice Blackmun cited in his majority opinion in J.E.B.(16) Professor Babcock argued that equal protection analysis mandated Batson's extension to gender "[b]ecause the story of women's exclusion from jury service is not only analogous to the history of racial exclusion but also the same story growing out of the same historical period and events.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Sex and the Peremptory Strike: An Empirical Analysis
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.