U.S. Willing to Discuss Microsoft Settlement

By Glanz, William | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), June 9, 2000 | Go to article overview

U.S. Willing to Discuss Microsoft Settlement


Glanz, William, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


The head of the federal government's successful antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. said yesterday he is willing to discuss settling with the software giant to avoid a lengthy appeals process.

Meanwhile, the computer giant is seeking a stay both on splitting the company and on changes to its business practices. U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ordered Wednesday that Microsoft be divided in two as punishment for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.

"I have said and believe that settlement is always the preferred course in this kind of litigation," Assistant Attorney General Joel I. Klein said.

"It's in the interest of the industry, it's in the interest of the company and it's in the national interest to have Microsoft address, in a meaningful way, the competitive issues . . . rather than to have a protracted legal proceeding," said Mr. Klein, head of the Justice Department's antitrust division.

Microsoft attorney William Neukom said during a conference call with reporters on Wednesday the company would consider participating in settlement talks.

"I don't think we ever have or ever would close the door to good-faith negotiations to resolve differences," he said.

Mr. Klein did not say whether he would accept a settlement that fell short of breaking up the company.

If the two sides agree on settlement talks, it would be the second time they sat down to discuss an out-of-court deal.

Justice has not made a formal proposal to Microsoft to renew settlement talks, Microsoft spokesman Jim Cullinan said.

Two weeks after ruling Microsoft was a monopoly, U.S. District Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson appointed Judge Richard Posner, head of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Chicago, to mediate an effort to settle the case.

But talks ended April 1 without an agreement.

Microsoft "has not indicated any positive sign of interest [in renewing settlement talks] since mediation ended," said Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, who co-chaired the effort of states to negotiate a settlement.

Mr. Klein said yesterday new settlement talks must include discussion of preventing Microsoft from repeating the business practices that led Judge Jackson to find it guilty of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.

But Microsoft won't participate in any settlement talks that include discussion of breaking up the Redmond, Wash.-based company.

"It's clear from their remedy proposal that that's exactly what they would be interested in talking about. . . . They're looking for punitive relief," Mr. Cullinan said.

Exactly what would be on the table for discussion is not clear, Mr. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

U.S. Willing to Discuss Microsoft Settlement
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.