Some Suggestions on Admitting Computer Graphics into Evidence at Trial

By Dunn, Richard M.; Brown, Christopher D. | Defense Counsel Journal, October 1998 | Go to article overview

Some Suggestions on Admitting Computer Graphics into Evidence at Trial


Dunn, Richard M., Brown, Christopher D., Defense Counsel Journal


Computer-generated visual evidence is likely to be compelling, so meeting the objections to its admissions is important

IF A videotape is the "the next best thing to being there," then a computerized graphic of an event is even better than being there. Unlike a videotape, a computerized graphic can show what would have happened, and it can do so without any of the shakes, stumbles, shadows and blurs that are the hallmarks of hand-held video cameras.

This article provides some practical suggestions on admitting this type of evidence. While it covers the major evidentiary issues, it is not an exhaustive discussion of the admissibility of this type of evidence.

WHAT IS CGVE?

Computer generated visual evidence, known as CGVE, is any graphic representation of an event that is created through the use of a computer. CGVE can consist of graphic reconstructions of actual events, simulated depictions of hypothetical events or simply data lists. This article deals only with computer depictions of accidents.

CGVE of both real and hypothetical events has been used in the courtroom for numerous purposes, including to recreate vehicle accidents and airline crashes, to demonstrate how a product is made, and to show the value of royalty interests in an eminent domain proceeding. In a jury trial involving complex expert testimony concerning an event, the impact of CGVE depicting that event can be staggering, because information presented in a graphic visual form is retained vastly better than information presented orally.(1) But the trial attorney who hopes to use this evidence must be prepared to lay the proper foundation and meet a host of objections. Conversely, counsel who faces the prospect of watching months of expensive trial preparation going down the tubes as a jury watches four minutes of devastating accident reconstruction in transfixed awe, had better know the objections to make to try to exclude CGVE.

THE LAW: GENERAL POINTS

The admission of CGVE potentially may implicate several of the Federal Rules of Evidence: relevance (Rules 401 and 402), prejudice (Rule 403), hearsay (Rule 803), scientific reliability (Rules 702 and 703), and authentication (Rule 901).

There is scant federal case law directly addressing the admissibility of CGVE. The only federal case with any detailed discussion of this issue is the Second Circuit's decision in Perma Research & Development v. Singer Co.,(2) in which a computer simulation was used to rebut testimony regarding the performance of an automotive anti-skid device. Two things are significant about Perma: (1) the CGVE was ruled admissible and (2) the only objection to admissibility addressed by the court was the fact that the proponent of the evidence had not provided sufficient discovery to allow cross-examination on the reliability of the simulation.

State courts also have been relatively silent as to what constitutes proper foundation to admit CGVE. Therefore, discerning the necessary foundation for admission of CGVE is almost entirely a matter of common sense and adherence to traditional evidence principles.(3)

DEMONSTRATIVE OR SUBSTANTIVE EVIDENCE?

One must ask, first, for what purpose is the CGVE being offered? Is it being used merely to illustrate and facilitate the testimony of a witness? Or is it being offered as substantive evidence? If it is offered to illustrate an expert's opinion, it is demonstrative evidence only. Demonstrative evidence may consist of charts, diagrams, objects or other items, including video or computer images, that assist a witness, usually an expert, in presenting testimony. The advantage of using CGVE as a demonstrative aid is that the evidentiary standards for its admissibility are relaxed. In fact, trial courts have almost unfettered discretion to allow witnesses to illustrate or explain testimony using a demonstrative aid. Unfortunately, the "demonstrative" vs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Some Suggestions on Admitting Computer Graphics into Evidence at Trial
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.