Alabama Prison Chain Gangs: Reverting to Archaic Punishment to Reduce Crime and Discipline Offenders

By Anderson, James F.; Dyson, Laronistine et al. | The Western Journal of Black Studies, Spring 2000 | Go to article overview

Alabama Prison Chain Gangs: Reverting to Archaic Punishment to Reduce Crime and Discipline Offenders


Anderson, James F., Dyson, Laronistine, Brooks, Willie JR., The Western Journal of Black Studies


Introduction

In the 1940s, chain gangs were outlawed as an appropriate correctional practice. Chain gangs became unpopular and started to decline because prisoners who were sentenced to them suffered disturbing abuses by those who operated prison systems, and from others who provided direct supervision over inmates assigned to work details. However, because of its increasing crime problem, Alabama has resurged chain gangs as a viable correctional policy (Donziger, 1996). Alabama prison officials argue that the purposes of chain gangs are fourfold: (1) To reduce the number of crimes committed; (2) to reduce repeat offenders; (3) to address disciplinary problems; and (4) to shame offenders into a life of conformity (The Mobile Press Register, 1996,4B).

Chain gangs are work details that permit prison inmates to leave a traditional prison setting for a specified period of time to be shackled with other inmates in leg irons to perform manual labor. The work details in which participants engage include: Removing trash from interstate roads; cleaning parks; painting shelters and benches; and repairing roads and fences (Donziger, 1996; The Mobile Press Register, 1996, 4B).

Chain gangs have ignited controversy in Alabama and have captured national attention. For example, though some residents of Alabama concede that chain gangs are punitive, they still favor using them as "a necessary evil." They contend that humiliation and hard work should deter criminals and potential law violators from engaging in crime. Yet, others oppose chain gangs and argue that this form of punishment conjures up memories of slavery and extreme brutality that blacks endured in the antebellum south. Moreover, the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADC) and other southern states have poor histories of affording fairness to black inmates. Therefore, implementing this type of punishment to an inmate population that is disproportionately African-American spotlights the brutality that has historically been given to blacks in southern states. Furthermore, the national audience has voiced its opposition to chain gangs by labeling them as discriminatory, repressive, brutal, unconstitutional, and shameful. However, despite the mixed feelings surrounding chain gangs lodged by Alabamians and national commentators, chain gangs are still used in Alabama and neighboring states. Despite criticisms, some officials of ADC contend that chain gangs will remain a part of the Alabama correctional arsenal (The Mobile Press Register, 1996, 4B).

This paper is divided into four parts. Part one addresses the historical use of chain gangs. Part two describes Alabama chain gangs. Part three discusses the unsafe aspects of chain gangs and the legal liabilities that could ensue from their use. Part four focuses on whether Alabama chain gangs are aimed at rehabilitating or punishing offenders. In the final analysis, we contend that chain gangs are a form of cruel and unusual punishment designed to dehumanize offenders.

Part I: The Historical Use of Chain Gangs In The United States

In 1878, as an attempt to reform the penal system, William Penn created the Philadelphia Society for Alleviating the Miseries of Public Prisons to reduce the high levels of corporal and capital punishment to which prisoners were subjected (McKelvey, 1972; Sellin,, 1967; Duffee, 1989). With this new penal code, insufferable conditions such as floggings, mutilations, and executions of inmates were replaced by imprisonment with hard labor (McKelvey, 1972; Sellin, 1967). One immediate result of this reformative effort was that inmates were quickly placed on chain gangs to work on city streets. The inmates assigned to work details were made to wear highly visible uniforms and engage in hard labor while chained to other inmates.

Historical commentators note that during the 18th century to the mid 19th century, it was commonly assumed that subjecting inmates to hard work was necessary to assist them in atoning for their misdeeds (Duffee, 1989). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Alabama Prison Chain Gangs: Reverting to Archaic Punishment to Reduce Crime and Discipline Offenders
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.