Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Unraveling the Economics of Deforestation; Many Government Policies Unintentionally Promote Costly Environmental Damage

By: Raloff, Janet | Science News, June 4, 1988 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Unraveling the Economics of Deforestation; Many Government Policies Unintentionally Promote Costly Environmental Damage


Raloff, Janet, Science News


Unraveling the Economics of Deforestation

Throughout the world, loss of forest cover is contributing to myriad environmental problems, including soil erosion, species extinctions, loss of soil productivity -- even the buildup of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels and potential "greenhouse" warming of the climate as woodlands are cleared for agriculture. "If we want to correct this problem, we need to know what's causing it," says James Gustave Speth, president of the Washington, D.C.-based World Resources Institute (WRI).

Many analysts view deforestation as a natural social response to such factors as unsustainable population growth, rural poverty and landlessness. But a new WRI study puts much of the blame elsewhere -- on misguided and unintentionally costly economic policies. The report challenges the long-held notion that the economic benefits of deforestation out-weigh its harmful consequences and argues for greater conservation of woodlands on grounds of a nation's economic self-interests.

Governments largely determine how forests will be used, WRI economist Robert Repetto says. However, his new study finds, even "governments, committed in principle to conservation and wise resource use, are aggravating their stewardship through mistaken policies" -- including subsidies, land tenure rights and the signing of relatively short-term logging-concession licenses.

Ironically, Repetto says, while governments tend to value their forest resources, most have felt that protecting them could be achieved only at the expense of economic …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?