U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Employee Rights

By Weatherington, Richard | Art Business News, August 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Employee Rights


Weatherington, Richard, Art Business News


When the U.S. Supreme Court speaks on employment issues, art dealers know it is time to listen. But this time, not only did the Supreme Court speak unanimously, its most recent ruling concerning workplace discrimination was loud and clear: If an art dealer lies about the reason for terminating an employee to cover up discrimination, it will be much easier in the future for the employee to win.

With the number of discrimination lawsuits tripling in the past eight years, art dealers can expect the reason they provide for termination to undergo even greater scrutiny. While the Supreme Court's ruling involved age discrimination, the principles expressed in the decision could be applied equally to other areas of discrimination, such as sex or race.

The Case

The case involved a 57-year-old supervisor whose duties included recording attendance and hours worked by his employees. His boss was a 45-year-old manager who complained that production was down because employees were often absent, late or left early. An audit was conducted and the supervisor was fired after 40 years on the job.

The supervisor filed suit for age discrimination. At trial, the company said he was fired for failure to maintain accurate attendance records. The supervisor claimed that reason was merely a pretext for age discrimination and introduced evidence that he had accurately recorded the attendance and hours. He then produced evidence that the department manager, who wielded "absolute power," was motivated by an age-based animus towards him and was principally responsible for his firing. The jury ruled in favor of the supervisor.

However, on appeal the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the judgement. When the case came before the United States Supreme Court, however, things changed in a big way. The Supreme Court determined that the Appeals Court wrongly adopted the premise that the employee must always introduce additional independent evidence of discrimination. It said that when an employee makes a case of discrimination and combines that with sufficient evidence showing that the employer's non-discriminatory reason for the firing was false, the courts may find that combination to be adequate to uphold a claim of liability for age discrimination.

What The Case Means for You

Once a case is established, the burden shifts to the company to produce evidence that someone else was preferred for a legitimate non-discriminatory reason. Once the employer produces sufficient evidence to support a non-discriminatory reason for its decision, the employee must be given an opportunity to prove that the stated legitimate reasons offered by the company were not the real reasons but were a pretext for discrimination.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Employee Rights
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?