Political Parties Agree to Revise Electoral Reform Bills Again

Korea Times (Seoul, Korea), January 17, 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Political Parties Agree to Revise Electoral Reform Bills Again

The political parties have succumbed to pressure from civic groups by agreeing to revise the controversial electoral reform bills under fire for their allegedly anti-reform content.

Both the ruling and opposition camps announced yesterday they would renegotiate on the disputed bills, thus delaying action on the bills slated for today to the next House session.

The rival camps are expected to resume negotiations after the inauguration of the new ruling party Thursday.

President Kim Dae-jung yesterday instructed the ruling National Congress for New Politics to revise the electoral reform bills again, with the opposition Grand National Party agreeing to their revision in the face of a strong public backlash.

Chong Wa Dae even hinted at the exercise of the presidential right to veto bills, noting the seriousness of civic groups' protests.

However, the GNP charged Chong Wa Dae with ``political fraud,'' saying the latter was claiming to have no responsibility for the disputed bills, in spite of its interference in the negotiation.

Civic groups jointly attacked the bills, singling out the decision to retain the controversial ban on campaigning by civic groups and the total number of House seats at 299, among others, as unacceptable.

They threatened to file a Constitutional petition against the new reform bills, saying the revision of the electoral system ended up merely safeguarding the vested interests of the political establishment.

``The parties turned their back upon the public's wish for political reform by making a collusive deal to keep their interests intact,'' the Citizens' Coalition for Economic Justice charged in its statement.

A leading member of the CCEJ charged, ``The parties should have cut House seats by at least 20 to demonstrate their willingness for reform. But they refused to make even a nominal reduction.''

The civic group also took issue with what it called ``gerrymandering,'' referring to the rezoning of some constituencies ``in favor of the current lawmakers.''

The rival camps went against the principle of constituency rezoning in accordance with population by retaining the eight constituencies in four cities - Wonju, Kangwon-do; Kunsan, Cholla-pukto; Sunchon, Cholla-namdo; and Kyongju, Kyongsang-pukto - despite their population being smaller than required.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Political Parties Agree to Revise Electoral Reform Bills Again


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?