The AHRB and the Funding of Archaeology

By Jubb, Michael | Antiquity, June 2000 | Go to article overview

The AHRB and the Funding of Archaeology


Jubb, Michael, Antiquity


The AHRB (Arts & Humanities Research Board) was established in October 1998, and is now in its second year of operation. A lot has happened in a very short time, in setting up the Board and its operations, in assessing applications and making awards, and in determining strategies and priorities for the future. The funds that the Board has at its disposal now amount to some 50 million [pounds sterling] a year, which brings with it an immense opportunity for research in the arts and humanities, but also an important set of responsibilities. For the Board has to show not only that it can distribute such funds effectively in supporting research of the highest quality; but also how the awards that it makes (:an make a difference not just for the research community, but in enhancing the social, economic and cultural life of the nation at large. It is in this context that we welcome the chance to respond to last September's ANTIQUITY Editorial that commented on the first few months of the Board's operations.

Throughout the period since its foundation, the Board has given high priority to consulting with members of the research community across the arts and humanities, in seeking advice and guidance on its structures, its schemes and its priorities. Professor Paul Langford as Chief Executive and Dr Michael Jubb as Director of Programmes have now visited nearly 100 higher education institutions (HEIs), and have spoken in addition to many learned societies and professional associations. The Board also held last year a series of symposia for representatives of different subject communities, and discussed with them a wide range of issues relating to the Board's strategies and operations.

The research community that the Board serves is large and diverse: over 12,000 academic staff in the arts and humanities were registered as research-active in the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) in 1996, in subject units of assessment ranging from art and design to philosophy, religious studies and law. (We are very much aware, incidentally, of the large numbers of researchers in the arts and humanities who work outside the higher education system; but because we can provide awards only to HEIs funded by one of the UK Funding Councils, we cannot make grants to them.) The programme of consultation has therefore been crucial in ensuring that the Board develops in ways that: maximize the benefits to all parts of the research community in the arts and humanities of the funds that it has at its disposal; and consultation will continue to be a priority. With respect to archaeology, 1999 saw a symposium attended by some 50 archaeologists alongside classicists and ancient historians; Paul Langford and Michael Jubb addressed a meeting of SCUPHA in October; and archaeologists have been prominent in the discussions during a number of visits to institutions. As a result of these discussions, as well as of the experience gained in handling the many applications from archaeologists in the various schemes of awards in both the postgraduate and the research programmes, the Board has developed a good understanding of the interests and concerns of the archaeological research community.

The AHRB and archaeology: the first year

The AHRB is keenly aware of the expectations of the archaeological community. Its members are prominent among the applicants for awards. Archaeologists are not among the largest sections of the research community in the arts and humanities: 371 archaeologists were registered as research active in the 1996 RAE, compared with 308 researchers in classics and ancient history, 1630 in history, and 1578 in art and design. But archaeologists generate large numbers of applications, for research grants in particular. In the most recent round of applications for research grants, for example, archaeologists submitted a total of 80 applications out of a total for all subjects of 435. That represents a considerably higher proportion of applications (18%) than might be expected from just over 3% of the total research-active community in the arts and humanities. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The AHRB and the Funding of Archaeology
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.