Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Why the World Is Simpler Than You Think

By: Buchanan, Mark | New Statesman (1996), October 9, 2000 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Why the World Is Simpler Than You Think


Buchanan, Mark, New Statesman (1996)


Earthquakes, forest fires, wars and stock markets: do they all follow a universal law?

In 1934, the historian H A L Fisher arrived at a rather bleak conclusion on the nature of human history. "Men wiser and more learned than I," he wrote, "have discerned in history a plot, a rhythm, a predetermined pattern. These harmonies are concealed from me. I can see only one emergency following upon another. . . and only one safe rule for the historian: that he should recognise in the development of human destinies the play of the contingent and the unforeseen."

Fisher was writing during the Great Depression, just 20 years after a chauffeur had touched off the First World War by taking a wrong turn, thereby enabling an assassin in Sarajevo to kill the Austro-Hungarian Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife. To Fisher and his contemporaries, accidents of all sorts seemed charged with an alarming power to set the world on its head. One day in 1920, a pet monkey bit and infected the King of Greece. The king's subsequent death set off a chain of political events that led to war between Greece and Turkey. "A quarter of a million persons," as Winston Churchill later commented, "died of this monkey's bite."

Today, we may all feel that Fisher's view was needlessly pessimistic, a mere product of the times. And yet, one may still wonder: do we really know anything about the natural dynamics and rhythms of history? Can we do anything more than guess as to whether there is "a plot, a rhythm, a predetermined pattern"?

It may sound ridiculous, but it is my belief that a new perspective on these questions may be emerging from, of all places, theoretical physics. It suggests that Fisher's suspicions were indeed well placed - that the course of human affairs possesses a rather extraordinary kind of unpredictability, and may always escape our efforts to understand it in terms of general causes and effects. What's more, it may be something like a law of nature that history must, by necessity, be punctuated by inexplicable and utterly unforeseeable upheavals.

To see the roots of this unlikely connection between physics and history, imagine sprinkling grains of rice on to a …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?