Codes of Conduct on Arms Transfers -- the Movement toward a Multilateral Approach

By Stoel, Jonathan T. | Law and Policy in International Business, Summer 2000 | Go to article overview

Codes of Conduct on Arms Transfers -- the Movement toward a Multilateral Approach


Stoel, Jonathan T., Law and Policy in International Business


I. INTRODUCTION

In the summer of 1978, with East Timorese guerrillas continuing to resist the Indonesia military occupation, the war struck my family. My sister Maria Ortensia was killed by a U.S.-made Bronco aircraft that was being used by Indonesian forces in East Timor for counterinsurgency. The same year I lost two brothers, Nunu and Guilherme, the first killed by fire from a U.S.-designed M-16 automatic assault rifle made under license in Indonesia, and the second during a rocket and strafing attack by a U.S.-supplied helicopter on an East Timorese village.(1)

--Jose Ramos-Horta, Nobel Peace Laureate, 1996

The use of weapons obtained through an international arms transfer, for internal repression, international aggression, and human rights violations remains a serious problem in the post-Cold War era. The incidents described above by Nobel Laureate Jose Ramos-Horta and the Indonesian Army's recent deployment of British helicopters and ground-support vehicles to suppress the East Timorese independence movement demonstrate the devastating effect that these weapons can have. At the domestic, regional, and international levels, legal efforts are currently under way to design codes of conduct that would deter the transfer of weapons that might be used to torture a nation's own citizenry, to stifle legitimate, non-criminal, anti-government political movements, or to attack a neighboring nation.

The purpose of this Note is to analyze four enacted or proposed codes of conduct on arms transfers: the U.S. Code of Conduct on Arms Transfers,(2) the International Arms Sales Code of Conduct, the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports, and the International Code of Conduct on Arms Transfers. This Note will assess each code's potential for political success, compare their effectiveness, and propose an alternative solution to the unilateral and multilateral codes of conduct currently in force or being considered. Part II discusses the size of the world's arms export market, focusing on government transfers of weapons to countries that use them to carry out internal repression, international aggression, or human rights abuses. Part III describes the currently pending U.S. Code of Conduct on Arms Transfers, the recently enacted International Arms Sales Code of Conduct, the EU Code of Conduct on Arms Exports, and the proposed International Code of Conduct on Arms Transfers,(3) and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each. Part IV uses United Kingdom (UK) and U.S. sales of weapons to Indonesia as a case study to provide a concrete example of the complexity of the issue and the need for a multilateral solution. Part V proposes a multilateral approach to the issue that is designed to halt arms transfers to undemocratic and human rights-abusing nations, thereby avoiding the weaknesses of a unilateral approach. This approach advocates the creation of a multilateral, supply-side treaty that would regulate arms transfers by monitoring exporting countries' behavior. In order to be successful, the treaty would have to be adopted with the support of the world's ten leading arms exporters.(4) The Note will conclude that despite the potential weaknesses of such a treaty, particularly in terms of enforcement, such a regime would be a more effective means of controlling arms transfers than the unilateral efforts now in place or being considered.

II. THE MAGNITUDE OF GOVERNMENT TRANSFERS OF WEAPONS TO COUNTRIES ENGAGED IN HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS OR ACTS OF INTERNAL REPRESSION

The international arms trade industry systematically moves arms from developed, predominantly democratic nations, particularly the United States, the European Union states, and Russia, to the developing world.(5) Many of the recipient nations are non-democratic or politically insecure states.

Worldwide arms transfers between governments were valued at $23 billion in 1998.(6) The United States led the world with thirty-one percent of all global arms transfer agreements in 1998, concluding agreements to supply more than $7.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Codes of Conduct on Arms Transfers -- the Movement toward a Multilateral Approach
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.