Using Benefit-Cost Analysis in Special Education

By Lewis, Darrell R.; Bruininks, Robert H. et al. | Exceptional Children, November 1988 | Go to article overview

Using Benefit-Cost Analysis in Special Education


Lewis, Darrell R., Bruininks, Robert H., Thurlow, Martha, McGrew, Kevin, Exceptional Children


Using Benefit-Cost Analysis in Special Education

Are we "getting our money's worth" from special education programs in the public schools? With the increasing application of benefit-cost analysis to other social service programs, the public has come to expect that similar economic analysis can somehow be applied to special education.

The "need" for special education is well established in the literature and political arenas, based upon concerns regarding the importance of providing children and youth with handicapping conditions access to social and learning opportunities similar to those afforded their nonhandicapped cohort. Most analysis of the merits of special education services focuses upon issues of access, equal opportunity, features of program models, and evaluation of program effects. The efficiency and productivity of special education services has received only minimal attention from policy makers, researchers, or practitioners. Although some recent attention has been directed at examining the costs of special education (see, for example, the review on this issue in Lewis, Bruininks, & Thurlow, 1987), little attention has been given to linking these costs with outcomes. To date, not a single study has attempted to systematically examine aspects of school-based special education services from a program efficiency or benefit-cost perspective.

On the other hand, during the past decade there has been a number of benefit-cost applications to postschool employment training alternatives for young adults with developmental disabilities. Recent reviews of these efforts are provided by Nobel and Conley (1987) and Rhodes, Ramsing, and Hill (1987).

Especially noteworthy has been the work by Cronin and Cuvo (1979); Hill, Hill, Wehman, and Banks (1985); Hill and Wehman (1983); Hill, Wehman, Kregel, Banks, and Metzler (1987); Kerachsky, Thornton, Bloomenthal, Maynard, and Stephans (1985); Lam (1986); Rhodes (1982); Schneider, Rusch, Henderson, and Geske (1981). Successful applications of benefit-cost analysis to other educational and social service programs can also be found in the broader literature (see, for example, Kemper, Long, & Thornton, 1981; Psacharopoulos & Woodhall, 1985; Thompson, 1980; Weber, Foster, & Weikert, 1978; and Weisbrod, 1981). Beyond employment data, little information of a systematic nature has been collected on the economic benefits of school-based special education programs. Admittedly, the evaluation of special education services for children and youth with handicaps is complex and should be focused upon the broadest form of analysis. Nevertheless, one useful, but by no means complete, strategy of special education evaluation involves the development of program outcome information in economic terms and more systematic benefit-cost assessments.

In most basic terms, benefit-cost analysis is concerned with assessing the relative economic efficiency of alternative programs through comparing their benefits against their costs of services. Thornton (1984) succinctly describes the primary aspects of this analytic approach:

The basic technique . . . is to assign dollar values to all estimated effects and costs. These values are them summed together to yield an estimate of the program's net present value (i.e., the difference between the benefits and costs where all dollar values are adjusted to reflect their value in a specific base period). This process is called "discounting" and is used to adjust the value of benefits or costs that accrue over several time periods to reflect their value at a specified base period. . . . A positive net present value indicates that resources are being used efficiently. A negative net present value indicates that (at least at its current scale) the program's resources could be used more efficiently elsewhere. (p. 226)

ISSUES IN THE USE OF BENEFIT-COST

ANALYSIS

The basic question being addressed in this article is whether formal benefit-cost analysis might allow us to determine whether the monetary outcomes of particular special education services for school-age children and youth are worth their resource costs. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Using Benefit-Cost Analysis in Special Education
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.