Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

Three `Faithless Electors' Could Still Give Election to Gore

By: Murray, Frank J. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), December 15, 2000 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

Three `Faithless Electors' Could Still Give Election to Gore


Murray, Frank J., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


A month-long crusade to persuade three of Texas Gov. George W. Bush's 271 hard-won electors to switch sides still could make Vice President Al Gore president.

In his concession speech Wednesday, Mr. Gore assured Americans that the Electoral College would ratify Mr. Bush as president-elect when electors meet Monday in 50 state capitals and in the District of Columbia.

But there is nothing in the law or Constitution that can prevent "faithless electors" from deserting their candidate. That has sparked speculation since November, when a veteran Democratic operative said that he was "trying to kidnap" Bush electors who might be willing to switch to Mr. Gore.

And in the five weeks since Election Day, tens of thousands of e-mails, letters and phone calls bombarded 172 Bush electors as a result of an Internet campaign engineered by two California college students, who say the popular vote should prevail over the Electoral College.

"I think this is exactly the kind of situation where the Founders, who originated the Electoral College, might want unbound electors to exercise discretion," said Beverly Ross, of Coral Gables, Fla., co-author of an Electoral College study cited twice in Tuesday's Supreme Court decision in the case of Bush vs. Gore.

There is precedent for mass defection as recently as 1960, when six Alabama electors who signed pledges to Sen. John F. Kennedy voted for Sen. Harry Byrd, Virginia Democrat, under a segregationist plan hatched by a Montgomery, Ala., lawyer who …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?