An Analysis: New Hampshire Primary Coverage

By Freitag, Alan R. | Newspaper Research Journal, Summer 2000 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

An Analysis: New Hampshire Primary Coverage


Freitag, Alan R., Newspaper Research Journal


Michael Gurevich and J.G. Blumler describe eight responsibilities of the media in a democratic society insofar as political coverage is concerned. Among them are such noble and laudatory tasks as surveillance of contemporary events, identification and elaboration of key issues, providing forums for advocacy, and so forth. Also included is the responsibility to provide incentives and information permitting citizens to become active participants in the political process, if only to make intelligent decisions in the voting booth.(1) In any presidential campaign, allegations are certain to surface concerning the inadequacy of media coverage, especially the impression that reportage tends to focus on the horse race aspects of candidates' campaigns rather than on the substantive issues and the distinctions among those seeking their parties' nominations.

Some have argued that the increasing prominence of electronic media, driven more by profit and entertainment value than by social responsibility, has had a detrimental effect on all media political coverage.(2) At the same time, presidential candidates since World War II have increasingly recognized the value of demonstrating their popular appeal if they are to be successful in their quest for the White House. That has meant a diminishing role for the major parties and ascending role for state primaries.(3)

It would be fair to consider 1952 a milepost year in the progressive changes ongoing. While in 1948 only 172,000 U.S. households owned a television set, by this presidential year 108 commercial television stations were broadcasting to more than 15,000,000 households - more than one-third the total.(4) In January 1952 NBC launched the Today Show, and July saw the first national telecast of the entire Democratic and Republican national conventions, with an estimated 50 million viewers.(5) More to the point, it marked the first year of what has become traditionally the nation's leadoff primary - that of New Hampshire. And for each quadrennial election since 1952, New Hampshire has taken tremendous pride in conducting the notion's first primary. It was a pivotal year in a period when the presidential nomination process was moving from smoke-filled rooms behind locked doors into a genuine, voter-driven process. Now every four years this state, with a population of just over a million, becomes the fulcrum of American political activity and the focus of media coverage of the presidential nomination process.

By state law, New Hampshire holds its primary election on the first Tuesday in March or at least one week prior to any other state conducting a similar election, whichever is sooner. Candidates, parties and pundits recognize the impact of the New Hampshire primary and devote extraordinary time, talent and treasure to achieving at least a respectable showing. Key, one can assume, is candidates' capturing voters' support through effective, positive and extensive media coverage, both locally to gain support of New Hampshire voters, and nationally to position themselves for subsequent primaries and establish themselves as electable in November.

But what is the nature of that coverage? Is it substantive, or is it superficial? Does it focus on the horse race aspect, addressing only popularity polls, campaign tactics, the importance of winning? Does it educate the voter or help the voter make a rational decision by addressing issues, positions, experience, character? Past studies of political coverage would strongly suggest an emphasis on the superficial.

This longitudinal study examines the thematic content of selected print coverage of the New Hampshire primary since its inception in 1952 through the 1996 campaign. It asks specifically whether newspaper coverage of election themes has evolved under the gradual shift away from nomination by party power brokers to election through the primary nomination process, and whether allegations of superficial coverage are a recent or a well-established phenomenon.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

An Analysis: New Hampshire Primary Coverage
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?