Cited page

Citations are available only to our active members. Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

X X

Cited page

Display options
Reset

The Psychology of Performance Management

By: Hultman, Kenneth E. | Training & Development Journal, July 1988 | Article details

Look up
Saved work (0)

matching results for page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?
While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.

The Psychology of Performance Management


Hultman, Kenneth E., Training & Development Journal


The Psychology of Performance Management

Low performance levels, demotivation, and turnover are among the quickest drains on productivity and human resources, and they affect employees in too many organizations. Training managers who have a competent grasp of the psychology of employee performance and motivation can help identify the true causes of performance problems and increase the chances of solving individual problems before they affect the entire organization. The following case study, based on a real-life situation, illustrates the importance of being aware of performance psychology.

Setting the stage

As the new director of training and development at a mid-sized manufacturing company, Ed Kincade discovered within the first few weeks on the job that four of his key managers had weak people skills and substandard performance in their departments. All had competent managerial skills, but they also had a negative, "Theory X" view of management--a view that employees inherently avoid work responsibilities and must be "managed" well to perform well. The Theory X perspective affected the ways these managers managed their own departments as well as the ways they expected to be treated by their own bosses. In an attempt to improve the situation, Ed sent the four--Barbara Grant, Jack Thomas, Mark Sommers, and Nancy Riley--to an intensive workshop on developing interpersonal supervision skills.

Six months later, only Nancy remained with the company and was progressing toward improving motivation and performance levels in her department. The other three quit or were fired for inadequate performance shortly after the workshop. During exit interviews, Ed discovered too late that the negative ways Barbara, Jack, and Mark treated employees were only symptoms of deeper, undetected problems.

The inputs and outputs of

performance

In any given situation, the performance of an individual is a function of at least four inputs: commitment, confidence, competence, and contingencies. Although other inputs may be involved, these four always are present. Performance outputs are expressed as feelings and behaviors that vary for each input and either encourage or discourage an individual's behavior. Because outputs result from inputs, labeling discouraging feelings and behaviors can help identify input problems. Performance deficiencies then can be corrected by altering inputs in ways that yield more encouraging feelings and behaviors. Figure 1 summarizes the inputs and outputs of performance.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Select text to:

Select text to:

  • Highlight
  • Cite a passage
  • Look up a word
Learn more Close
Loading One moment ...
Highlight
Select color
Change color
Delete highlight
Cite this passage
Cite this highlight
View citation

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?