Courts Make School Safety Our Responsibility

Daily Herald (Arlington Heights, IL), December 8, 1999 | Go to article overview

Courts Make School Safety Our Responsibility


Byline: Denise Raleigh

Last week, a 15-year-old student at Downers Grove North High School admitted that he brought homemade bombs to school two times during the 1998-99 school year.

In an even more high-profile case, seven youths recently were expelled from their Decatur school after starting a brawl in the bleachers.

And on Monday, a 13-year-old boy in Oklahoma shot four other students.

As we all know, I could list many more shocking incidents where students were put in harm's way by fellow classmates.

I talked with the parent of another student at Downers Grove North soon after the second bomb was found. She was angry and frightened. Her child had been in a classroom near where the bomb was found. Understandably, she wondered what level of protection her child was being afforded.

She was not the first parent I've heard voice that sentiment.

What are the rights of the students who are not violent or disruptive? They can best be explained by looking at the rights of all students. Many of these rights have been fashioned via federal court cases since many school districts receive governmental immunity protection in the state courts.

There have been different results in different courts, but some basic parameters have been decided by the Supreme Court.

In the landmark 1975 case Goss v. Lopez, the Supreme Court decided critical issues that guide school districts across the country concerning student expulsions and suspensions.

The case arose when nine students in the Columbus, Ohio, public school system challenged their suspensions. Not all the students were involved in the same incident, but they all thought their suspensions were unfair.

Six of the Columbus students were involved in a demonstration at one high school in which a student attacked a police officer who was trying to remove another student demonstrator. One of the students was suspended after a lunchroom scuffle that involved damage to school property. Another student was involved in a demonstration at yet another school.

The Supreme Court determined that a student's entitlement to a public education was highly protected because Ohio's laws made provision for a free public education and compelled attendance for people within a certain age range.

So public education fell into the protected interests covered by the 14th Amendment forbidding "the state to deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Courts Make School Safety Our Responsibility
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.