The Case against Charitable Choice

By Matsui, Elena; Chuman, Joseph | The Humanist, January 2001 | Go to article overview

The Case against Charitable Choice


Matsui, Elena, Chuman, Joseph, The Humanist


Charitable choice was one of the issues of the 2000 elections upon which there was supposed agreement. Since Congress passed, and President Bill Clinton signed, the 1996 Welfare Reform Act. which includes a charitable choice provision, the concept is engraved in law. But is it really such a good idea?

Ethicist and church-state scholar Paul Simmons doesn't think so. He observes, "Those who advocate public support for clergy or religious enterprises have not come to terms with the corrupting and enervating effect of governmental protectionism. Efforts to protect lead to corruption and weakening of religion by the civil powers."

Marci A. Hamilton, professor of law at Yeshiva University's Cardozo School of Law, also warns, "The next major church-state issue to become a source of conflict will likely be social service contracts based on the charitable choice provision of the welfare reform act. The potential constitutional problems have hardly been evaluated. When religion steps into the shoes of government, the civil rights of those receiving the funds become an issue. In order for the transmission of funds to be constitutional, the government will be required to place limits on how the funds are administered, including limitations on proselytization. Such limits, though, invite free exercise challenges from the churches. Government funding in any category implicating First Amendment values invites discord and litigation."

In the following two essays, written independently of each other, three humanists examine charitable choice and what it means for U.S. citizens. First, Elena Matsui and Joseph Chuman make their "Case Against Charitable Choice" from a civil liberties viewpoint. Then Lyse Hurd offers a look at the other side from a social service standpoint.

IT WILL TURN religion against religion. It will make religion a servant of the state. It will let our government play favorites among believers, and it will destroy the separation of church and state as we have known it.

A scenario concocted out of the Middle Ages? A nefarious plot by satanic evildoers? No, it's charitable choice and it's a very dangerous idea.

The Welfare Act of 1996 was passed by Congress to replace the old Aid to Families with Dependent Children program, a federal entitlement with block grants to be distributed by the states. Charitable choice is one provision of the new law, and it allows the federal government to contract with faith-based agencies serving single mothers with dependent children. It emerged from the notion that faith-based services can be more effective than secular ones.

More recently, Republican Senator John Ashcroft of Missouri (defeated in the 2000 elections by the late Mel Carnahan) introduced legislation to expand charitable choice to every current and future health and social service program that receives federal funds, including homeless and senior initiatives, juvenile services, substance-abuse treatment and prevention programs, and abstinence education. The aim of charitable choice is to divest the state of its social responsibilities. However, by involving faith-based organizations, the churches in effect become administrative arms of these government programs. The initiative was the signature issue of George W. Bush's effort to portray himself as a "compassionate conservative" as he campaigned last year for the presidency, and Al Gore, striving to outdo Bush as a "friend of religion," also spoke glowingly of charitable choice.

But any true friend of religion should be very wary of charitable choice for the threats it augurs for religious freedom. Scores of national religious organizations and hundreds of religious leaders across the religious spectrum--from conservative to liberal-advocate against charitable choice. Among them are the Baptist Joint Committee, representing eleven Baptist bodies; the Presbyterian Church U.S.A.; the American Jewish Committee; the conference of Seventh-day Adventists; the Church of the Brethren; various Roman Catholic organizations, the Friends, and the Unitarian Universalist Association. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Case against Charitable Choice
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.