Media Myopia and the Future of Democratic Politics

By Buell, John | The Humanist, January 2001 | Go to article overview

Media Myopia and the Future of Democratic Politics


Buell, John, The Humanist


As I write this column, the major media are still gripped by a modern political soap opera. Votes from the 2000 U.S. elections have been counted and recounted, litigation has reached the highest court in the country, the stock market bounces nervously, and media pundits speculate on the health of the nation. Yet the Florida recount battle has distracted many citizens from a story with more enduring significance.

The major media "call" of Florida for Al Gore--and then for George W. Bush--on the evening of November 7 exposed a narrow and herdlike media. Its leaders place short-term, bottom-line considerations ahead of larger democratic needs. Consequently, the media today are incapable not only of serious scrutiny of our democratic practices but even of informed coverage of political races. Drawing on identical data and obsessed with the desire to be first, the major media all marched lemminglike off the cliff election eve.

Political reporting increasingly resembles sports coverage. Endless polls tell us who is gaining ground, and issue coverage is confined to discussions of who gains strategic advantage by the way disputes are parried or poses are struck.

If politics is being covered as a horse race, one would expect the media to at least do that job well. But Florida became almost as much of a badge of shame to the media mavens as it was a legal crisis for the Bush and Gore camps. Unable to resist the urge to be first with the call, major media twice gave viewers misleading information. Painful and embarrassed retractions occasioned promises to seek the causes of error and to do better next time. Unfortunately, little of the on-air commentary provided viewers with an adequate sense of the depth of the problem.

All of the major media based their calls on data supplied by the Voter News Service, a consortium established by the networks to conduct exit polling and gather results from sample precincts. Through the 1988 presidential election, however, each of the networks maintained its own polling operation. Under that prior system, it would have been entirely possible for different networks to have made different "calls" on Florida. Or, seeing their rivals making other forecasts, some could have held off.

The VNS was created solely to save costs. Media analysts total the savings at around $10 million per network. For these savings--a tiny fraction of their total budgets--citizens pay a high price. Not only are the number of samples on which predictions are based limited, networks must also work from one uniform set of exit polling data.

Exit polls purport to provide some sense of why elections go as they do. But these polls can shape, as much as reflect, ongoing political debate. Such questions as "Does the economy or the environment matter more to you?" are based on and reinforce the contestable view that these concerns can be neatly separated. (I would argue that here in Maine, jobs that erode the fisheries, forests, and scenic vistas--our "natural capital"--may themselves not be sustainable. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Media Myopia and the Future of Democratic Politics
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.