Hollywood Goes Global - Why Hollywood Isn't American Anymore

By Olson, Scott R. | The World and I, February 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Hollywood Goes Global - Why Hollywood Isn't American Anymore

Olson, Scott R., The World and I

Scott R. Olson is dean of the College of Communication, Information, and Media at Ball State University in Muncie, Indiana.

There was a time not long ago when Hollywood was the apotheosis of indigenous, authentic culture, and that view is still held by cultural elites in many countries. In one round of GATT talks, France famously tried to limit the amount of American media programming allowed within its borders. Most fear of American media is based on the premise that American values are being exported within the media, like soldiers in a Trojan Horse, but recent studies have found indigenous cultures to be quite resilient in their interpretations of Western media. The era of throwing up barricades in resistance to imported media has for all practical purposes passed, replaced by an interest in the hybridity or interstitiality of contemporary cultures. Hollywood is now too ephemeral and omnipresent a foe for a barricade to keep it out.

The reason for the holes in this wall are simple. Hollywood has become an aesthetic and is no longer just a place in California. That aesthetic has been increasingly adopted by other media production centers in other countries around the world. Contrary to what is commonly reported, the Hollywood aesthetic is not particularly an American aesthetic, at least not anymore. It is a global aesthetic, and that sums up its transnational appeal.

California is joined by Brazil, Hong Kong, and other production centers in the scramble for global audiences, and they are all in a way "Hollywood." It means adopting a certain way of engaging audiences with media texts, a way that allows vastly different kinds of audiences to make sense of the same media texts.

Hollywood has so transcended geography that its name has been appropriated and is now used to describe media capabilities in countries outside the United States. For example, the film production center in India is now commonly called Bollywood, and in Hong Kong it is called Dongfang Haolaiwu, or "Hollywood of the East."


Understanding how this Hollywood aesthetic evolved can best be illustrated by a metaphor. In 1990, an interesting research project took place at the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Arkansas. Judith Langlois and Lori Roggman took photographs of thirty- two different faces representing a mix of ethnicities, then used computer imaging technology to "morph" (that is, blend the features of each into a new coherent whole) these images into a single face, resulting in a new, synthetic image and the thirty-two real, original faces. These thirty-three images were then shown to audiences, which were asked for their assessment of the images' attractiveness: Which face do you rate the most beautiful?

Interestingly, the raters were most attracted to the composite face, which to them seemed warmer, softer, prettier, and more familiar. Part of its beauty must have been in the fact that the raters could see themselves in her. Langlois and Roggman concluded that averageness1-- features normed across an entire population, or even the human race-- must in part form the basis for attractiveness.

A later study found that a certain amount of cultural distinctiveness combined with the averageness led to optimal attractiveness, but the scientific consensus remains that averageness is the basis of attraction. One need not be a behavioral scientist to see the metaphoric significance of these findings. For those interested in culture, the message is fairly clear: Appealing images have a prevailing norm underneath the surface, the coming together of diverse idiosyncrasies to form an attractive and familiar whole. This metaphor says something about what is attractive in movies and television programs that cross national boundaries and succeed in the international marketplace. To be intelligible, they have underneath them a normative mode of communicating.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Hollywood Goes Global - Why Hollywood Isn't American Anymore


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?