Divided Supreme Court Ends Welfare-Reform Cases Ban

By Murray, Frank J. | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), March 1, 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Divided Supreme Court Ends Welfare-Reform Cases Ban


Murray, Frank J., The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


A divided Supreme Court yesterday declared unconstitutional the politically charged 1996 law that barred legal-aid lawyers who get federal funds from challenging welfare-reform laws.

The 5-4 decision came on the same day justices heard arguments regarding a nonsectarian Bible club for young children that met on school grounds, and a case about government limits to a political party's spending on its own candidates.

Yesterday's decision to overturn a Republican-backed act of Congress that curbed spending by the federally funded Legal Services Corp. (LSC), now frees lawyers from restrictions on the kinds of cases they may file for welfare clients or applicants, and ends an outright ban on challenges to the constitutionality of welfare laws.

"We must be vigilant when Congress imposes rules and conditions which in effect insulate its own laws from legitimate judicial challenge," the majority opinion said.

"The [law] prohibits speech and expression upon which courts must depend for the proper exercise of the judicial power. Congress cannot wrest the law from the Constitution which is its source," said the court opinion written by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, joined by Justices John Paul Stevens, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer.

A dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia - co-signed by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor and Clarence Thomas - attacked the ruling for "improper special solicitude" to the legal profession.

"It also displays, I think, the very fondness for `reform through the courts' - the making of innumerable social judgments through judge-pronounced constitutional imperatives - that prompted Congress to restrict publicly funded litigation of this sort," the dissenting opinion said.

The American Civil Liberties Union called the ruling an important victory.

"From the beginning it was apparent that the congressional attack on the legal services program was ideological and punitive," said Steven R. Shapiro, national legal director for the ACLU. "We hope it will encourage a reexamination of the other restrictions. . . ."

Other rules ban the LSC from political activity or using of federal funds in most criminal cases, for lawsuits involving elective abortion, school desegregation, military desertion or draft laws.

The 1996 welfare law was approved after a major battle to fulfill President Clinton's vow to "end welfare as we know it." During his administration, welfare rolls fell by nearly 60 percent with more than 8 million people cut.

Yesterday's decision could revive challenges to the restrictions that caused many liberals to turn on Mr. Clinton.

The case to recover welfare benefits lost by New York City grandmother Carmen Velazquez was brought by individual legal-aid lawyers and a coalition of nonprofit groups that generally supported Mr.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Divided Supreme Court Ends Welfare-Reform Cases Ban
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.