House Votes to Repeal Rules on Job Safety

By Ramstack, Tom | The Washington Times (Washington, DC), March 8, 2001 | Go to article overview

House Votes to Repeal Rules on Job Safety


Ramstack, Tom, The Washington Times (Washington, DC)


The House followed the Senate yesterday in voting against new job-safety rules intended to protect as many as 102 million workers from repetitive-motion injuries.

Only President Bush's signature on the bill is needed to kill the measures by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. They went into effect Jan. 16, after 10 years of development, by executive order of President Clinton, four days before he left office.

The House voted 223-206 to repeal the OSHA rules less than 24 hours after the Senate took similar action. President Bush is expected to sign the legislation, despite the opposition of labor unions.

Republicans and the Bush administration have criticized the OSHA rules as too costly and burdensome on business. OSHA estimates the cost of complying with the rules to be $4.5 billion, but business groups say the tab would run between $20 billion and $120 billion.

"This administration is committed to protecting the health and safety of workers," the White House said in a statement. "That's why the Department of Labor will pursue a comprehensive approach to addressing this issue. There is a real concern about the overly burdensome current rules because of the negative impact they would have on jobs and economic growth." Rep. John A. Boehner, Ohio Republican, called the rules "an unworkable, excessive regulation that causes more problems than it solves."

Rep. Ric Keller, Florida Republican, said workers' compensation insurance premiums already create an adequate incentive for employers to make workplaces safe without adding the cost of more OSHA regulations.

Democrats argued that repeal of the OSHA rules would leave workers without adequate protection from injury. They also said employers would recover the cost of compliance through lower medical bills for workers.

"Each year, more than 650,000 American workers suffer from repetitive-motion disorders," said Rep. Nita M. Lowey, New York Democrat. "It is time to stop these injuries."

The vote was the first major victory for Republicans and the first opportunity for Mr. Bush to sign significant legislation.

It also was the first time Congress has overturned an executive order under the 1996 Congressional Review Act. The act gives Congress the right to repeal federal agency regulations by a simple majority vote and forbids the agencies from instituting similar rules without Congress' permission.

The act was enacted with little fanfare and little objection from the Clinton administration five years ago as a way to encourage federal agencies to be cautious in their rule making.

"With today's vote, we send the message to future presidents that if you impose a regulation with an executive order that would hurt America, Congress will repeal it," said Rep. Roscoe G. Bartlett, a Maryland Republican who voted to repeal the OSHA regulations.

The vote leaves supporters of the OSHA ergonomic rules with no legal recourse.

"There's nothing you can go to court on," said Peg Seminario, the AFL-CIO's safety and health director. "This is an act of Congress. Period. End of story."

The AFL-CIO, a national organization of 66 major labor unions, consulted with the workplace agency in developing about 600 pages that explain the job-safety rules. In the days before the vote, the labor group mounted a lobbying effort that included bringing workers with crippling injuries to Washington to meet with members of Congress.

Miss Seminario said she doubted Congress would revive similar repetitive-motion rules anytime soon.

"Actions speak louder than words, and their actions for the last 10 years say they oppose any government action that would protect workers from these crippling injuries," she said. "We're very disappointed. This isn't a union issue. This is a worker issue."

Business groups and some Republicans, however, warned the compliance costs could drive some of them out of business. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

House Votes to Repeal Rules on Job Safety
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.