The Cobata Colossal Head: An Unfinished Olmec Monument?

By Hammond, Norman | Antiquity, March 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Cobata Colossal Head: An Unfinished Olmec Monument?


Hammond, Norman, Antiquity


The discovery of the Cobata colossal head in 1970 brought the number of such Olmec monuments in the Gulf Coast heartland region to 15, added to those already known from San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, La Venta, and Tres Zapotes (Clewlow et al. 1967; De La Fuente 1973). It was the largest known example, at 3.4 m high and with lateral dimensions of 3 m from back to front and side to side, `un enorme bloque petreo de superficies mas o menos redondeadas ... su aparencia no es, sin embargo, uniforme' (De La Fuente 1992: 106).

It was also the most unusual by comparison with the overall design range of the others, leading De La Fuente (1974: 56; 1992: 117) to conclude that `el diagnostico del estilo sugiere francamente la ubicacion tardia, no olmeca, de esta escultura excepcional' (although her 1973 catalogue includes it among the 204 Olmec pieces, not the 44 additional doubtfully Olmec ones). Cyphers (1996: 55) describes it as `different from the others in that the headdress is stylized, the eyes are closed and it has a peculiar mouth, features that make it lose the portrait-like quality of the other heads. The headdress, without design, is formed by a smooth horizontal band surrounding the upper part. The lack of realism is observed also in the flattened nose which lacks nostrils. Some specialists believe the head represents a deceased person' (cf. De La Fuente 1973: 125).

De La Fuente (1973: 124) notes that the archaeological context in which the head was found contained Late Classic period sherds, together with an even later offering in front of a Fine Orange plate and obsidian knife, hence her view that it is a late piece. There is, however, circumstantial evidence to suggest that the Cobata head is, like those from La Venta, San Lorenzo and Tres Zapotes, Olmec; and that the unusual features of its design are the result of its shaping and carving never having been completed (FIGURES 1 & 2 ).

[Figures 1-2 ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The head was found on the side of the Cerro El Vigia, near Santiago Tuxtla in the Tuxtla Mountains of Veracruz (it now resides in the town's main plaza). The Tuxtlas area is the source of the olivine-augite basalts (Clewlow et al. 1967: 69-70; Williams & Heizer 1965) used for all the Olmec colossal heads, and those at La Venta and San Lorenzo were moved a considerable distance, most likely by water as far as was possible. The Cobata head is the closest to the source area: Williams & Heizer (1965) report that the rock from which Tres Zapotes CH 1 and Nestepe CH 1 were made (also known as Tres Zapotes Monuments A and Q, although the latter was found some 3 km north of the site) is from Cerro Vigia itself.

The reported find-spot of the Cobata head does not seem to have been a major site, in spite of the associated cultural material: the head could have been abandoned unfinished at source (supposing that colossal heads were completed, to lose unnecessary weight, at the quarry), or it could have been abandoned en route to its eventual destination. If the latter, its degree of incompletion would usefully demonstrate the extent to which the Olmec went to rough-out colossal heads, leaving most of the fine detail to be added at the destination; the asymmetry of the incompletion on the Cobata head does not, however, support this interpretation.

A striking feature of the Cobata head's shape is that it does not taper inwards below its greatest width, but sits squatly on the ground. On other heads, removal of the rock surface around and then below the earflares to leave them in low relief has created a slight taper towards the base, a feature absent on the Cobata head. Some irregularity of the surface just above the base, visible especially on the chin, suggests an unfinished area, as does the asymmetry of the recessed area below the mouth, where the left side is more finished than the right. The Cobata monument also lacks the flattened back of many of the other heads, which were recarved from rectangular block thrones (Porter 1989; whether a deceased ruler's throne was recycled to form his funerary portrait as a deified ancestor, or whether the incoming ruler had his life-mask carved from his precursor's vacant throne, are matters beyond this short note).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Cobata Colossal Head: An Unfinished Olmec Monument?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?