Radical Royalism: Strategy and Ambivalence in Dryden's Tragicomedies

By Coltharp, Duane | Philological Quarterly, Fall 1999 | Go to article overview

Radical Royalism: Strategy and Ambivalence in Dryden's Tragicomedies


Coltharp, Duane, Philological Quarterly


In the following pages, I want to ask what it might mean to call John Dryden, particularly the Dryden who produces the two-plot tragicomedies, a "radical royalist." Christopher Hill has coined this phrase to describe those Restoration writers who embraced the intellectual heritage of the English Revolution--ideas championed by Levellers, Diggers, Ranters, and republican regicides--while nonetheless serving the Stuart monarchy. Hill defines this category so as to include Samuel Butler and John Wilmot, Earl of Rochester, among others; he generally neglects Dryden.(1) As if to correct for Hill's oversight, David Haley has recently argued that Dryden retained the puritan radicalism of his family throughout much of his public career, repositioning himself as an Anglican royalist only when the Exclusion Crisis threatened to plunge England into another civil war.(2) Haley's book provides a salutary rebuke to the habit of reading Dryden as a Tory-royalist mouthpiece, but I think that it announces Dryden's radicalism too baldly, without sufficient regard for the contradictions that Hill's phrase implies for Restoration royalism. In Dryden's case, these contradictions are both strategic and ambivalent. They proceed from Dryden's attempt to appropriate revolutionary energies for royalist uses; but they prepare for a less confident articulation of royalist doctrine, in which the panegyric celebration of monarchical authority is threatened by the satiric denunciation of royal flaws.

As a systematically divided, ostensibly disjunctive form, Drydenesque tragicomedy bears the outward marks of the Restoration paradox.(3) Although my concerns are not primarily formal, I take this divided form as the raison d'etre for an analysis that sees Dryden's tragicomedy as a complex intervention within a conflicted historical moment. In pursuing this analysis, I want to challenge the more straightforward accounts of the ways in which royalism operates in Restoration tragicomedy, including accounts by Douglas Canfield and Nancy Klein Maguire.(4) At the same time, I want to question the most paradoxical of all discussions of Restoration tragicomedy, the dialectical reading of Marriage A-la-Mode offered by Michael McKeon.(5) For McKeon, the heroic plot of Marriage A-la-Mode embodies a set of "feudal-aristocratic, heroic, idealistic, and hierarchical values"--the conservative values that Canfield, for instance, finds dominant throughout the tragicomic structure--while the comic plot bears an opposite set of "individualistic, mundane, skeptical, and empiricist values": in short, the emergent values of a bourgeois society.(6) Associating the two plots with competing economic forces, McKeon then finds, in the subtle relations between plots, a dialectical knowledge that overrides Dryden's avowed preference for monarchical authority and aristocratic privilege. McKeon's is a strong reading, but it errs by treating art as a way of knowing rather than, say, a way of believing and enforcing belief. Neglecting the rhetorical functions of art in favor of its epistemological ones, McKeon must finally say that Marriage A-la-Mode tells the whole truth about class struggle in seventeenth-century England, even if this truth is such that it exceeds Dryden's own intentions. Perhaps the best rejoinder to such a reading was offered, albeit proleptically, by William Empson. The double plot "gives an impression of dealing with life completely," Empson wrote, "so that critics sometimes say that Henry IV deals with the whole of English life at some date, either Shakespeare's or Henry's; this is palpable nonsense, but what the device wants to make you feel."(7)

Following Empson rather than McKeon, one might suppose that the appearance of dialectical wholeness is itself a strategic fiction, a rhetorical effect. This effect depends, paradoxically, on the narrowing of social range that characterizes Dryden's tragicomedies. There is no "low" plot to speak of in these plays, no Falstaff (as in Henry IV) and no Mak and Gill (as in The Second Shepherds' Play).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Radical Royalism: Strategy and Ambivalence in Dryden's Tragicomedies
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.