A Billion-Dollar Story: The Trial of Donald and Si Newhouse

By Pollak, Richard | The Nation, March 13, 1989 | Go to article overview

A Billion-Dollar Story: The Trial of Donald and Si Newhouse


Pollak, Richard, The Nation


The U.S. Tax Court is only a short cab ride from the Washington bureau of Newhouse Newspapers, but the dedicated news hounds there employed somehow have managed to miss the compelling tale just concluded in the courtroom. This demonstrates puzzling news judgment, for the several million readers of the chain's twentysix newspapers doubtless would find instructive an exploration of the government's accusation that the Newhouse family has dodged more than $1 billion in taxes.

Normally, so many allegedly delinquent digits trailing behind such high rollers would bring reporters running like lottery winners, but the rest of the press also has studiously ignored or played down the Newhouse trial. Thus, a wide public has been deprived of many useful revelations, among them Samuel Newhouse Jr.'s insistence that it is difficult to explain how the family made business decisions because "a little bit like trying to describe love." In fact, a certain amorousness does surface in the court papers from time to time, notably when they record intrafamily largesse: One year, for example, Donald Newhouse received a salary of $397,839, plus dividends totaling more than $650,000, an amount he regards as "nominal."

The unpleasantness between the Newhouse family and the Internal Revenue Service may constitute the biggest estate tax case ever to come before the court. Even so, I probably would never have noticed it had I not been sensitized over the years by a press ever alert to the tax problems of certain headline-worthy politicians. Indeed, the Newhouse papers themselves have displayed admirable vigilance in pursuit of such corner cutters like Lee Alexander, the former Mayor of Syracuse, New York. The chain's Post-Standard and Herald-Journal, good watchdogs that they are, barked noisily for months before Alexander ultimately was found guilty on tax evasion and other charges last year. In fact, no sooner was the Federal indictment handed down in 1987 than the Herald-Journal editorialized that "the case looks solid," adding that if Alexander was found guilty "we will have precious little sympathy" for him.

The government's case against the Newhouse family may be solid, too, but I resist any rush to judgment, for such haste is not the American Way. Suffice it to say that the trial deserves a bit more attention than it has got, even though it is complex and the arithmetic involved requires a certain concentration. I urge readers to press on, if only to put their own tax problems into perspective as April 15 looms. After all, if two brothers who control a fortune estimated at $5.2 billion may lose a fifth of it to the government, how bad off can the rest of us be?

Our story begins in 1979, when Samuel Irving Newhouse died. He was 84 years old and had pursued a sufficiently full life to leave behind the largest privately held media empire in the United States. Besides the newspapers, which also included the Newark Star-Ledger, the Cleveland Plain Dealer and the New Orleans Times-Picayune, he owned some cable television operations and Conde Nast magazines, Mademoiselle and Vogue among them. The magazines he bought in 1959 as-he liked to say-a surprise present for his wife, Mitzi, on their thirty-fifth wedding anniversary.

Six months after "S.I." died, his two sons, the aforementioned Samuel Jr. (Si) and Donald, together with the family's fiduciaries, valued his gross adjusted estate at nearly $181.9 million and filed a return listing the net tax due as just shy of $48.7 million. After some scrutiny, the I.R.S. in 1983 advised the brothers that the estate was worth an estimated $1.2 billion, and thus the tax as computed was deficient by more than $609 million. Moreover, the government tacked on a 50 percent penalty ($304 milion and change) for civil fraud.

This is big money even for rich folks, and the brothers Newhouse took considerable offense, calling the fraud charge "preposterous" and accusing the I. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Billion-Dollar Story: The Trial of Donald and Si Newhouse
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.