Approval of Voting Technology Is Tough State Manager Proud of Strict Standards

By Filaroski, P. Douglas | The Florida Times Union, May 9, 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Approval of Voting Technology Is Tough State Manager Proud of Strict Standards


Filaroski, P. Douglas, The Florida Times Union


Byline: P. Douglas Filaroski, Times-Union staff writer

Vendors dread it. Local election officials live with it. Florida voting system manager Paul Craft chuckles when asked about the state's tough process for approving new voting technologies.

"I think we are probably the toughest in the nation," said Craft, whose office must certify systems before they can be used by Florida voters. "We are very proud of that. I don't see any reason to change."

Six months after Florida's national election embarrassment, the Legislature last week approved spending $24 million so counties can replace those troublesome punch cards with new technology. Gov. Jeb Bush is expected to sign the bill today.

The question now is whether Craft's office -- proud of its tough, often time-consuming approval process -- can certify cutting-edge technologies, such as touch-screen voting, in time for statewide elections in 2002.

Several counties have expressed interest in electronic voting, particularly those like Duval, where a newer system might have lessened problems during November's tumultuous election.

"Obviously, it would have helped," said John Stafford, Duval County's election supervisor, who promised voters in 1998 he'd replace the antiquated system that produced the infamous hanging chads.

But the state has never certified a touch-screen voting system. Craft said it's because vendors never applied -- until recently. Vendors say it's because the state's tough process has for a long time discouraged them.

"Vendors go where the fish are biting," said Todd Urosevich, president of Election Systems and Software in Omaha, Neb., the nation's largest voting system maker.

"Because of the certification process, Florida was not one of those states where it was worth it to invest the time and money," Urosevich said.

Twenty-one Florida counties use Election System optical scanners, fax-like machines that scan and read paper ballots marked with pen or pencil. But most were sold in the late 1980s or early 1990s, said Urosevich, whose company has not had new hardware certified in about 10 years.

"Florida has a reputation as being tough because they've earned it," said Urosevich, whose company has tried for 18 months to certify a newer optical scanner system. It applied last week for touch-screen certification.

Larry Ensminger, a vice president for Global Election Systems, another large

manufacturer, said his company has had the same experience -- applying, reapplying, testing and retesting.

The voting system standards themselves -- which are technical -- aren't much different than many other states, vendors said. It's largely Craft's application of the standards that make the process more difficult, vendors said.

Florida requires applications to include more information and machines to be tested under more scenarios than most states, vendors said.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Approval of Voting Technology Is Tough State Manager Proud of Strict Standards
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?