Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology(*)

By Landsbergen, David, Jr.; Wolken, George, Jr. | Public Administration Review, March 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology(*)

Landsbergen, David, Jr., Wolken, George, Jr., Public Administration Review

Concerned parents noticed an abnormally high incidence of leukemia among River Valley High School graduates, in Marion, Ohio. After investigating their hunches, they learned that leukemia rates had increased 122 percent between 1966 and 1995. The parents then learned that the high school was built near a World War II bomb-making plant that had leaked cancer-causing chemicals. Relating disease clusters to environmental factors occurred through personal recollections of friends and family of the cancer victims. It took almost 30 years for the community to accumulate the evidence to tie their hunch to a suspected cause (adapted from Rieppenhoff and Woods [1997]).

Interoperability among epidemiological, Department of Defense, and Census Bureau information systems could have facilitated making these correlations faster and easier, perhaps saving lives.

While technology offers great promise for improving government, it is also true that every important new technology invariably poses a challenge to the status quo and puts a strain on existing social contracts on "who gets what." In the River Valley case, collecting information about cancer-causing agents would have made it much easier to anticipate potential problems. But is this something that is central to the mission of the Department of Defense? How does the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) make the case to the Department of Defense that it should provide this information to the EPA?

This article argues that interoperability is more than getting bits and bytes to flow properly--fundamentally, the goal of interoperability is the much more difficult problem of getting people and organizations to share information in an information-technology environment.

To really understand the possibilities, it is important to see the big picture of the opportunities for improving government through the appropriate use of technology. In the span of some 50 years, our computing technology has already gone through three significantly different generations of computers (Andersen and Dawes 1991).(1) We are now living in the fourth generation of computing technology--the networking of computers. The introduction of the World Wide Web is the most visible of the many new fourth-generation technologies.

The third generation of computers--personal computers--increased the ability to collect and store information on each person's desktop. Yet with this exponential growth in the power of personal computers, the fourth generation of computers is even more impressive because it leverages the power of each of these powerful desktop computers. The leverage is gained through the networking of computers. Theoretically, networking makes it possible for the information and processing power on all of these desktop, mainframe, and super computers to become available on each individual's desktop. In practice, the problem of "interoperability" is how to make this promise a reality.

This article begins with two illustrations of attempts to improve interoperability. The literature review then builds a comprehensive list of the major threats and opportunities to interoperability, including prior work which has discussed the problem or a proposed solution.(2) The literature review examines the many dimensions of the interoperability question, including previous work on interoperability as well as relevant work on information-technology management, intergovernmental relations, and innovation, information, and information technology policy.

After the literature review, the methodology section discusses several phases in the research design. A key element in obtaining rigorous results was the use of a "tight" learning loop--every new insight or practical recommendation learned was immediately included in the set of working findings and recommendations so that it was tested in the next cycle. For example, where interviews were used, each person was asked, do you agree with our working set of findings and solutions?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Realizing the Promise: Government Information Systems and the Fourth Generation of Information Technology(*)


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?