A Comprehensive Look at Tax Court Valuation

By Thomas, Deborah W.; Gregson, Terry | Akron Business and Economic Review, Spring 1989 | Go to article overview

A Comprehensive Look at Tax Court Valuation


Thomas, Deborah W., Gregson, Terry, Akron Business and Economic Review


A Comprehensive Look At Tax Court Valuation

The valuation of property is an issue that arises in many areas of tax accounting. When disputes over value between the taxpayer and the government occur, the United States Tax Court is most often the forum that resolves the question. The Tax Court has the reputation of compromising valuation issues. In Buffalo Tool & Die Manufacturing Co. v. Commissioner [74 T.C. 441], decided in May, 1980, the Tax Court, suspecting that compromise was expected, warned practitioners that parties who did not settle valuation issues prior to trial would run the risk that the Court would decide the issue substantially in favor of the other party. This study examines Tax Court valuation decisions after 1980 to determine whether the Tax Court has, in fact, chosen the value of one party over the other rather than compromised.

BACKGROUND

The Tax Court Rules of Practice provide in Rule 142 (a) that, as a general rule, the taxpayer must bear the burden of proof in all Tax Court cases. Therefore, if the taxpayer fails to produce adequate evidence of value, the Court must rule in favor of the government. If both the taxpayer and the government submit substantial evidence of value (such as calling appraisers as expert witnesses, establishing a recent sale, or other acceptable means), the Tax Court must then weigh the evidence and decide what is the fair market value of the property. Though guidelines for valuation exist for some types of property (see Rev. Rul. 59-60, 1959-1 CB 237), the Court most often must rely on the basic legal definition of value, "the price at which the property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts" (Regs. [Section] 1.170-1(c)(2); [Section] 20.2031-1(b)).

This process of determining value for tax purposes has been widely criticized [7, 9, 11, 12]. Tax practitioners perceive that the Tax Court compromises valuation issues[8]. In Buffalo Tool & Die, the Tax Court recognized this be lief and warned practitioners that it should not continue. The court stated:

We are convinced that the valuation issue is capable of resolution by the

parties themselves through an agreement which will reflect a compromise

Solomon-like adjustment, hereby saving the expenditure of time, effort, and

money by the parties and the Court--a process not likely to produce a better

result. Indeed, each of the parties should keep in mind that, in the final

analysis, the Court may find the evidence of valuation by one of the parties

sufficiently more convincing than that of the other party, so that the final result

will produce a significant financial defeat for one or the other, rather than

a middle-of-the-road compromise which we suspect each of the parties

expects the Court to reach. If the parties insist on our valuing any or all of the

assets, we will. We do not intend to avoid our responsibilities but instead

seek to administer to them more efficiently--a factor which has become

increasingly important in light of the constantly expanding workload of the

Court.

Tax practitioners recognized a change in the Court's behavior after this announcement of a more stringent policy toward valuation issues[2].

PREVIOUS STUDIES

Tax Court valuation policy has been the subject of a number of studies prior to 1980. Each of these studies looked at the Court's valuation decisions in only one type of case or for only one type of property, particularly charitable contribution cases and estate and gift tax cases that involved closely held stock.

Charitable Contributions. Englebrecht and Jamison examined the population of charitable contribution cases decided from 1970-1977[5]. The authors developed a model using the court-determined value divided by the amount claimed by the taxpayer as the dependent variable and the compromise value divided by the amount claimed by the taxpayer as the independent variable. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Comprehensive Look at Tax Court Valuation
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.