Blame It on Amis, Barnes and McEwan

By Cowley, Jason | New Statesman (1996), June 4, 2001 | Go to article overview

Blame It on Amis, Barnes and McEwan


Cowley, Jason, New Statesman (1996)


British novels no longer bring us "news" of our times.

The British novel is back in the stocks -- and this time it is the ubiquitous Andrew Marr who is throwing the wet sponges. The impish political editor of the BBC is surely exhibiting early symptoms of that fever of irrationality and omnipotence that seems to afflict judges of our leading literary prizes (I should know: I was a jabbering victim myself when I judged the Booker in 1997). Marr used the recent announcement of the shortlist for the Samuel Johnson Prize for Non-Fiction to complain about the mediocrity and imaginative paucity of the modern British novel compared to the range, readability and urgency of so much non-fiction.

Now. Marr is a clever chap, but his views on the novel ought not detain us for too long - because he has never exhibited an active, rigorous engagement with modern British fiction, as either a critic or a writer of fiction. In any event, by seeking to generate faux controversy, he was merely fulfilling the duty of every chairman of a literary jury.

More problematic, and perhaps more pertinent, are the views of Dale Peck, the talented young American critic-novelist. Reviewing Julian Barnes's feeble Love, Etc in the New Republic, Peck suggested that the elite of British fiction -- Barnes, McEwan, Amis, Rushdie and so on -- had systematically "ruined" the British novel. "The idea that Julian Barnes is the successor to Sterne is nearly as unbearable as the idea that Margaret Drabble is George Eliot's heir," he wrote. "And how has Fielding been watered down into A S Byatt and Defoe bastardised into Jeanette Winter-son." As for Ian McEwan: "His novels smell worse than the newspaper wrapped around old fish." Zadie Smith? "Too Oxbridge."

Peck continued: "I do not mean to suggest that there are not any good writers in Britain... merely that the writers who have been anointed as the propagators of the great tradition of British fiction seem to be intent upon destroying all that is good in that tradition. Virginia Woolf thought that reading Ulysses was like watching a schoolboy pick his zits in public, but if her alternatives were Will Self and Tibor Fischer, perhaps even she would jump on the Julian Barnes bandwagon."

Reading Peck, one wonders what it is about the modern British novel that compels so many critics to traduce it? Why, when confronted with, say, the latest easy read from Nick Hornby or the latest soft-focus romance from Sebastian Faulks, do Marr, Peck and other serious readers recoil in disappointment? Why do the repeated criticisms of the British novel -- that it is clever but empty; that few, if any, writers can do character and narrative; that most have lost confidence in the fictional possibilities of England-resonate so peculiarly?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Blame It on Amis, Barnes and McEwan
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.