Parallels Seen in Microsoft, Cards Cases

By Lee, W. A. | American Banker, July 2, 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Parallels Seen in Microsoft, Cards Cases


Lee, W. A., American Banker


An appeals court's mixed ruling in the government's antitrust case against Microsoft Corp. could have implications for the civil lawsuit that merchants have filed against Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard International over debit card policies.

Visa and MasterCard said the Microsoft ruling Thursday by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit could bolster their position in the so-called Wal-Mart case, though other observers said the decision would help the merchants. The lead attorney for the merchants, Lloyd Constantine, said he did not think it would have any effect on his case.

All sides seemed to agree in finding parallels between the allegations in the Justice Department's case against Microsoft and those in the retailers' lawsuit against the card associations, for which no trial date has been set. Like Microsoft, Visa and MasterCard are accused of trying to monopolize their market and are charged with tying one product -- in this case, debit cards -- to a second, credit cards, in which they have market power.

Both the plaintiffs in the Wal-Mart case and the prosecutors in the Microsoft case argue that the monopoly practices and tying arrangement violate the Sherman Act, a pillar of antitrust law. Some people involved in the Microsoft trial -- and others who are keeping a close eye on it -- say that the appeals court's analysis of the government's charges may influence the District Court's behavior when its considers Wal-Mart's accusations.

The Wal-Mart case cannot go to trial before a decision is given by the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, which is considering Visa's and MasterCard's appeal of the class-action status granted the case. If the appeals court reverses this certification, the case would go to trial more quickly because there would be fewer plaintiffs to notify, but if the court upholds the class-action status, lawyers would have to contact the four million merchants who qualify for the class.

David A. Balto, former policy director of the competition bureau of the Federal Trade Commission and now a partner in the antitrust group of White & Case LLP, said the Microsoft case "is a wonderful analogy to the Wal-Mart case."

Mr. Balto said that, on the major issue, the Microsoft decision is favorable for the merchants. "The good news for Wal-Mart is, the court found Microsoft was a monopolist."

He added, "That's a nice precedent on which the Wal-Mart claim can set sail in establishing that Visa has market power."

On the tying issue, the appeals court rejected Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson's analysis and remanded the case to District Court. Though the appeals judges agreed with Judge Jackson that Microsoft had tied its Web browser, Internet Explorer, to its platform, the Windows operating system, it ruled that the per se standard is not applicable to the software platform market. Instead, the trial judge must apply a "rule of reason" to decide whether valid business reasons exist for tying the two products together.

In the Wal-Mart case, the merchants say that unfair rules by Visa and MasterCard force them to accept the associations' debit cards despite those products' higher fees compared to other debit cards. The class seeks monetary compensation as well as association rule changes that would decouple acceptance of credit cards from debit cards.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Parallels Seen in Microsoft, Cards Cases
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?