The Bush Administration and the Caspian Oil Pipeline

By Rasizade, Alec | Contemporary Review, July 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Bush Administration and the Caspian Oil Pipeline

Rasizade, Alec, Contemporary Review

AMONG the major issues where the Bush Administration will have to cope with the Clinton legacy, is the Caspian pipeline project. The State Department invested heavily in a grandiose strategy that has been to press the Caspian countries and international consortia operating in the region to export their oil and gas westward through pipelines that would terminate in Turkey. These costly projects, the Baku-Ceyhan oil pipeline and the Trans-Caspian gas pipeline from Turkmenistan, never made obvious economic sense.

Recent studies by two independent research groups in Washington, the CATO Institute and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, have criticized the economic justification for the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline, urging consideration of Russian and Iranian alternatives. That said, the Bush Administration is likely to take a different view of the projects.

Both President Bush and Vice President Cheney have direct links to American oil corporations, and would therefore be expected to promote their interests. Richard Cheney has been an outspoken advocate of ending economic sanctions against Iran. Now the Vice President can encourage American oilmen overseas who were convinced several years ago that transporting the oil via Iran would be more reasonable than building a proposed Azerbaijan-Georgia-Turkey pipeline at a cost of some $4 billion.

Of course there has been a long-standing American embargo against Iran. Cheney began challenging the logic of the Iranian embargo several years ago. As chief executive of Halliburton, a giant oil-services company, he believed that the Clinton strategy was wrong. His comments reflected a broad skepticism within the oil industry about the wisdom of that policy. Many analysts say now that projections of the Caspian oil potential rest on a number of questionable assumptions while the actual amount is much less. After digging of many dry holes by several oil companies in the Caspian, the region that had been pushed by Washington as an alternative to the Persian Gulf has been dismissed as a product of the State Department propaganda.

Instead of the politically bloated appraisal of 200 billion barrels of Caspian oil reserves (compared with Saudi Arabia's 250 billion) valued at 4 trillion dollars, exuberantly cultivated for years by the State Department to allure American investors into the region and justify its own strategy there, we are talking now about 15 billion to 30 billion barrels of proven reserves, most of which are confirmed under the Kazakhstan section of the sea.

Part of the problem is that what the U.S. government says tends to be taken much more seriously outside the United States than within. Oil industry analysts react with scepticism to claims made by U.S. officials concerning the Caspian Sea potential. Unfortunately, local leaders in the region take such claims at face value, concluding that the U.S. government knows something that they do not.

Similarly, when Washington tells them that the Baku-Ceyhan project is commercially viable, the governments conclude, wrongly, that the State Department knows more about oil export pipelines than oil companies.

Clinton promoted a role for Turkey through the pipeline that would carry Caspian oil from Baku in Azerbaijan to Turkey's Mediterranean part of Ceyhan via Georgia, thus bypassing Russia and Iran. He also backed the proposed gas route running across the Caspian seabed from Turkmenistan to Turkey via Azerbaijan.

The State Department has been a staunch advocate of both projects and had the leaders of Turkey, Georgia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan sign a package of legal framework agreements in Istanbul in 1999 under American auspices. The plan's objective was twofold: to reduce Russia's political influence in the Caucasus by pushing it out of the Caspian Sea, and further isolate Iran there.

There was a degree of logic to this. Both Russia and Iran are competitors in the oil and gas markets of Caspian Sea exporters -- Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

The Bush Administration and the Caspian Oil Pipeline


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.