Dilemmas for Teacher Education Programs

JOPERD--The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, September 2001 | Go to article overview

Dilemmas for Teacher Education Programs


B. Ann Boyce

During the next decade, approximately two million new teachers will be needed to fill positions created by retiring teachers and those switching professions and by the dramatic increase in student enrollment (Bradley, 1998; Smith, 2001 ).The projected retirement rate alone is cause for alarm, with approximately 24 percent of elementary teachers and 26 percent of secondary teachers expected to retire in the next 12 to 15 years (Bandeira de Mello & Broughman, 1996). So, how will we produce the teachers we need to carry us forward in the 21st century? And what obstacles will we have to overcome in order to teach all children effectively?

Along with the dilemma imposed by the teacher shortage, teacher education programs are constantly being challenged to improve the quality of their graduates. This is usually accomplished by increasing the standards for admission, retention, and/ or matriculation to meet the requirements of state departments of education, national accreditation agencies (e.g., NOATE, NASPE, TEAC), national certification tests (e.g., Praxis I and II), and universities. While no one is opposed to improving the quality of our future teachers, it seems that some of the very institutions that should be supporting the improvement of teacher education may actually be hindering this process, especially in light of the teacher shortage. This editorial addresses two such problems: (1)the lack of universal passing scores or criteria for Praxis tests, and (2) the push by national and state departments of education for alternative certification programs that are not held to the same academic rigors as university programs. Furthermore, thes e issues will be discussed in terms of their impact on the teacher shortage and on the quality of the preservice teachers participating in alternative certification programs.

At many academic institutions, Praxis I is used either as a screening tool for entry into teacher education programs or as grounds for dismissal from those programs. The test consists of a basic academic-skills assessment in the areas of reading, writing, and mathematics, and it is usually taken during the second or third year of a student's academic preparation. In most cases, if the test is not passed, then a student is not admitted to, or is dismissed from, the teacher education program. The cut-off scores for passing are determined by each state; thus, no comparisons can be made between states. Furthermore, the test differs slightly from state to state because the Educational Testing Service, which creates the test, must use questions dictated by each state's department of education.

The way the test is currently conducted creates inconsistencies among those tested, and the students in our programs know about this problem. For example, about three years ago, one of my sophomores remarked to me, "If I don't pass the test [Praxis I], I will simply go to school in another state, take and pass the test in that state, and then return to Virginia to teach in a couple of years due to the reciprocity agreement between the two states." Virginia's passing criteria for Praxis I continue to be among the highest in the nation (DeMary, 2000), and it is obvious that my student knew this and was prepared to circumvent the system. By the way, she passed the test in Virginia and is now teaching there. But difficult questions remain: Why aren't there uniform passing criteria for Praxis I across all states? For that matter, why aren't there uniform passing standards for the Praxis I test in the areas of health and physical education? What impact do high Praxis I cut-off scores have on the pool of potential teachers?

From a review of two Virginia Department of Education documents, a partial answer can be offered. The data from DeMary (2000) revealed that for the academic years of 19961997, 1997-1998, and 1998-1999, average pass rates for the Praxis I across the areas of reading, writing, and mathematics were approximately 69 percent, 65 percent, and 64 percent, respectively. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Dilemmas for Teacher Education Programs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.