Congress to Weigh Privacy Right vs. Security Need Legislation May Mean Intrusiveness

By Patterson, Steve | The Florida Times Union, September 24, 2001 | Go to article overview

Congress to Weigh Privacy Right vs. Security Need Legislation May Mean Intrusiveness


Patterson, Steve, The Florida Times Union


Byline: Steve Patterson, Times-Union staff writer

Intent on safeguarding the United States from terrorism, federal officials have envisioned new security tactics that may sharply challenge Americans' traditional expectations of privacy and civil liberty.

Policies ranging from aggressive new airport security systems to the use of national identity cards and indefinite jailing of some non-citizens, with no chance for trial, have been proposed or discussed in Washington since the terror attacks that killed more than 6,000 people Sept. 11.

Both supporters and critics acknowledge the potential for these measures to shrink America's expectations of personal freedom, disagreeing only on whether the promise of additional safety outweighs that loss. With dozens of distinct measures under consideration by Congress or federal bureaucracies, it is too early to say which ideas will take root. More ideas are expected to advance in coming weeks.

"We've heard so many proposals and speculation," said Nadine Strossen, national president of the American Civil Liberties Union. "We've only seen the tip of the iceberg."

A handful of anti-terrorism measures now under consideration illustrate the breadth of choices about personal liberty that Americans and their leaders will have to make.

Legislation that Attorney General John Ashcroft unveiled last week would let the Justice Department jail foreigners indefinitely without trial if the attorney general certifies they might be involved in terrorism or other national security threats.

The idea alarmed civil rights advocates, who said people might be locked up for years without the government producing any evidence of guilt. Congressional hearings are expected to be held this week on the legislation, the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001, which contains dozens of separate provisions.

Justice officials scaled back the detention proposal as the week progressed. A draft bill circulated Sept. 17 said non-citizens could be detained indefinitely for deportation, and that there could be no appeal to any court until the Immigration and Naturalization Service issued a final deportation order. Late in the week, a draft said immigrants could file appeals, but only in a U.S. district court in Washington. Opponents said that didn't help, because a ruling on the appeal wouldn't be binding unless an immigrant happened to be locked up in that judicial district.

Debate about the detention plan mirrors earlier criticism of the government's use of so-called "secret evidence," classified information the Clinton administration used to hold some immigrants without disclosing their reasons to the defendant. A University of South Florida professor, Mazen Al-Najjar, was held for three years before a federal court decided last year there wasn't evidence to justify incarceration.

"We're going from secret evidence to no evidence," said Strossen, whose group organized a push last week by a political rainbow of organizations worried about the loss of rights.

Legislation to ban secret evidence was scheduled for debate in Congress before Sept. 11. But Ashcroft said last week the country needs to carefully measure public safety and constitutional rights.

"Very frankly, those who attacked the United States would attack the constitutional rights as well as the safety of individuals," Ashcroft said at a news conference. "We're going to do everything we can to harmonize the constitutional rights of individuals with every legal capacity we can muster to also protect the safety and security of individuals."

INTERNET SNOOPING

Legislation authored in the past two weeks would make it easier for federal investigators to search people's e-mail and to get information about computer users' identities and habits as part of a terrorism investigation.

Two days after the attacks, the Senate passed a rider to a disaster relief bill that would help the FBI use monitoring equipment including Carnivore, a system that can screen large amounts of e-mail for specific information. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Congress to Weigh Privacy Right vs. Security Need Legislation May Mean Intrusiveness
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.