Inmates' Religious Rights: Deference to Religious Leaders and Accommodation of Individualized Religious Beliefs

By Davis, Heather | Albany Law Review, Winter 2000 | Go to article overview

Inmates' Religious Rights: Deference to Religious Leaders and Accommodation of Individualized Religious Beliefs


Davis, Heather, Albany Law Review


In Jackson v. Mann,(1) an inmate in a New York State correctional facility claimed Department of Correctional Services [DOCS] officials were violating his First Amendment right to exercise his religion.(2) The inmate, Nathaniel Jackson, voluntarily stated his religion as Jewish upon entering the New York correctional system in 1986, and subsequently received kosher meals at various facilities.(3) In 1995 Jackson was transferred to the Shawangunk correctional facility, and he requested a continuance of kosher meals.(4) Shawangunk's rabbi refused to recognize Jackson as Jewish because Jackson could not prove he was Jewish in accordance with the standards of Judaism set by the New York Board of Rabbis, and the Shawangunk facility deferred to the rabbi's decision and removed Jackson from the kosher meal program.(5) Jackson sued the rabbi and other correctional facility officials alleging that denying him kosher meals violated his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment Rights.(6) Upon appeal of summary judgment entered in favor of the correctional facility officials,(7) the Second Circuit found that Jackson's claim raised a genuine issue of material fact,(8) that being whether Jackson sincerely held his religious beliefs.(9) The court held an inmate need not be a member of a religious group to be considered sincere in his or her religious beliefs,(10) and remanded the case for a sincerity determination.(11)

Jackson left open the question of who should determine whether an inmate is a bona-fide member of a religious group,(12) and this comment argues that determination should be left to religious leaders, not correctional facility officials.(13) In New York, inmates who are members of religious groups receive a set of privileges in accordance with the dictates of that religious group.(14) A religious group is defined in correctional facilities as a group that is officially recognized for program activities.(15) Correctional facility officials will recognize any group as qualified for religious activities as long as the group has: 1) an outside religious leader, 2) a body of dogma, and 3) some tradition or history indicating the group was not formed in the correctional facility.(16)

Regardless of who makes the determination of membership, inmates who are deemed not to be members of religious groups may request their own personal religious beliefs be accommodated.(17) Inmates who are deemed not be, a member of a religious group may either claim they belong to a religious group that correctional facility officials do not recognize, or claim they practice a recognized religion in their own unique way.(18) These inmates are said to hold "individualized" religious beliefs.(19)

Correctional facility officials are under no obligation to accommodate these individualized religious beliefs if the inmate is not sincere in his or her religious beliefs.(20) Traditionally, sincerity has been determined as a threshold matter on a case-by-case basis.(21) If the inmate is sincere, correctional facility officials must follow the constitutional standards set forth by the Supreme Court to accommodate the inmate's beliefs, as well as the statutory requirements set forth by Congress.(22)

The practice of determining sincerity of inmates' individualized religious beliefs on a case-by-case basis is untenable in the correctional facility setting.(23) This comment sets forth a solution that correctional facility officials should assume all inmates with individualized religious beliefs are sincere in those beliefs and provide a uniform set of privileges to accommodate those beliefs.(24) Providing this uniform set of privileges is constitutionally permissible under both the traditional standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Turner v. Safley,(25) and under the recently enacted Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000.(26)

I. DEFERRING TO THE RELIGIOUS LEADER TO DETERMINE MEMBERSHIP

Correctional facility officials should defer to religious leaders in determining whether an inmate is a bona-fide member of a recognized religious group.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Inmates' Religious Rights: Deference to Religious Leaders and Accommodation of Individualized Religious Beliefs
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.