The Politics of Reconciliation Revisited: Germany and East-Central Europe

By Phillips, Ann L. | World Affairs, Spring 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Politics of Reconciliation Revisited: Germany and East-Central Europe


Phillips, Ann L., World Affairs


A theme of atonement toward both domestic and neighboring victims of National Socialism distinguishes West German policy from that of other former Axis powers after World War II. Since 1989, Germany has intensified its commitment to a well-established, post-war policy of reconciliation in Western Europe to assure neighbors that unification would not derail European integration. In East-Central Europe (ECE), Bonn initiated a new phase of reconciliation, a process that until 1990 had been hobbled by the division of Europe and of Germany. Reconciliation quickly assumed a high profile in Germany's relations with the region, much as it did in West Europe after World War II. In ECE the politics of reconciliation have shaped distinct bilateral relations that continue to diverge ten years after the revolutions of 1989. In this article, I analyze the dynamics of that process.

Three dimensions of reconciliation form the centerpiece of the inquiry. The first is Germany's unique dedication to reconciliation with its former enemies and victims. What factors motivated West Germany after World War II and united Germany after 1989? Individual processes of reconciliation constitute the second dimension. Here the role of guilt and victimhood in domestic politics informs the uneven progress toward reconciliation in German relations with Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary. I explore the interaction through three issues that are common to, but distinct in, relations with each of three groups: victims of National Socialism, German minorities in ECE, and expellees. Finally, the impact of reconciliation on traditional power relations in this region of post-cold war Europe is analyzed.

To address these issues, I must begin with a discussion of the concept of reconciliation. A significant literature has developed that sets forth varying demands and thresholds of reconciliation.

RECONCILIATION

The Concept

Most of the literature on reconciliation applies to domestic matters ranging from family quarrels to ethnic conflicts. An elaborated, systematic definition applicable to relations between states remains elusive, despite increasing use of the term.(1) A composite definition can be constructed from a variety of works even though the authors often disagree on essential components. In its simplest, crystallized form, reconciliation means restoring friendship, harmony, or communion. Applied to states, it incorporates a societal as well as an official quest to generate a reservoir of mutual trust supportive of warm, friendly relations. Official declarations of friendship between state leaders alone cannot create a climate of confidence and trust between societies. Government-to-government relations can, however, contribute to reconciliation by transforming the tone and range of official contacts, so that conflicts can be gradually muted and shared interests nurtured without suspicion. Reconciliation does not posit harmony between two states or peoples; it does, however, create a more felicitous environment within which conflicts can be addressed. The need for reconciliation presupposes a traumatic experience locking two peoples in an ongoing cycle of mistrust, fear, and/or hatred.(2) The challenge varies based on the gravity and duration of the conflict.

A growing number of scholars working on the issue have identified two thresholds of reconciliation. The less exacting one is essentially pragmatic. It focuses on cooperation driven by common, contemporary interests. The second threshold demands much more than accommodation; it requires the development of sympathy and empathy that shared interests alone cannot generate. Joseph Montville emphasized the psychological element of reconciliation, in particular the role of victimhood in history.(3) Addressing painful questions of the past openly and honestly is essential to provide the foundation for a fresh relationship, according to Bjorn Krondorfer in his book on young Jews and Germans.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Politics of Reconciliation Revisited: Germany and East-Central Europe
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?