Performance Appraisal in Higher Education: Comparing Departments of Management with Other Business Units

By Clement, Ronald W.; Stevens, George E. | Public Personnel Management, Fall 1989 | Go to article overview

Performance Appraisal in Higher Education: Comparing Departments of Management with Other Business Units


Clement, Ronald W., Stevens, George E., Public Personnel Management


Performance Appraisal in Higher Education: Comparing Departments of Management with Other Business Units

The study reported here extends our knowledge of personnel practice in the public sector by looking at faculty performance evaluation in U.S. business schools. This study examined not only the relative importance of teaching, research, and institutional service, but also the emphasis placed by administrators upon the many performance activities within teaching, research, and service. For example, within the research category, the importance of published articles, other publications, and many forms of non-published research were examined. And for teaching performance, the relative weights given to student inputs, peer evaluation, and certain data on the courses taught were considered. In addition, the study reported here compared evaluation practices of departments of management with those of other departments within the typical business school.

Recent concerns about American higher education indicate that U.S. business schools need to evaluate their faculty on a more thorough and objective basis. The issues in question here are important, and are being raised by a growing number of critics from several business education constituencies.

First of all, the very relevance of business education has been questioned.(1) Specifically, business schools are said to be graduating narrow task specialists rather than the creative leaders needed in today's global organization. Graduates can apply highly technical quantitative models but supposedly are unprepared to respond to a world economy. Hayes and Abernathy(2) report that the business student today is taught a preference for analytic detachment rather than a feel for real-world business problems; they also charge that graduates are led to focus on short-term cost reduction rather than creativity, development, and a long-run commitment to customers and employees. In a similar vein, Cheit(3) reports concerns that business schools today are too quantitative, too theoretical, and too removed from real business and organizational problems. Among other things, he calls for further internationalization of the business curriculum and a better balance between cognitive and non-cognitive skills in business higher education--the important non-cognitive or "affective" skills include the communication, motivation, and leadership areas.

A second reason to improve faculty evaluation has to do with the apparent lack of affirmative action in today's business schools. Recent research shows quite clearly that the promotion rate for female assistant professors is less than four-fifths of that for males.(4) Such a disparity in treatment is called "adverse impact" by the federal Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures; its presence is considered a sign of probable discrimination. And despite a reduced emphasis upon affirmative action by the recent preseidential administration, university administrators need to consider that these Uniform Guidelines may be applied to their personnel decisions.(5)

Yet a third reason to improve faculty performance appraisal comes from the business school administrators themselves. For example, Cornwell(6) found that, even though these administrators felt evaluation of teaching was important, they largely ignored approaches other than the traditional student ratings. Approaches recognized as useful, but seldom used by these same administrators, included the review of course syllabi and the use of classroom visits by the department chair. Overall, these respondents did seem to recognize that the faculty evaluation process could be more objective. The problem was not a lack of methodology, but the absence of motivation and resources, especially time.

The final impetus for improved evaluation of business faculty involves the tenure situation in American universities today. Although the tenure ratio for faculty in the business area is not known, research shows that about three-fourths of university faculty in general have tenure. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Performance Appraisal in Higher Education: Comparing Departments of Management with Other Business Units
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.