Locking Up Our Lands

By Jasper, William F. | The New American, October 8, 2001 | Go to article overview

Locking Up Our Lands


Jasper, William F., The New American


Though the federal government already owns one-third of all land in the United States, still more landgrabs are being planned through the Conservation and Reinvestment Act.

How do you create a seemingly unstoppable bill in Congress? Step one: Load the bill with tons of juicy pork. Step two: Generously spread the pork, in bipartisan fashion, to as many greedy, noisy, and influential constituencies as possible. Step three: Associate the bill with a noble purpose, such as "saving the children," "safeguarding the elderly," or "protecting the environment." Step four: Hide the bill's true costs and cover up other negatives associated with the legislation.

The bipartisan proponents of H.R. 701, the Conservation and Reinvestment Act (CARA), have followed this formula to perfection. Reintroduced in February by Rep. Don Young (RAlaska) and billed as a wildlife and habitat conservation effort, CARA has amassed an impressive 239 cosponsors, more than the simple majority needed (218) to pass the House. Still, it is not unstoppable. Rep. J.C. Watts (R-Okla.) has withdrawn as a co-sponsor, and others will follow if sufficient numbers of taxpayers, property owners, and other constituents become aware in time of CARA's hidden dangers.

A Massive Landgrab

Opponents have dubbed CARA "The Central Planning/Land Nationalization Act." They call it "a massive government landgrab," and with good reason. The bill calls for spending more than $46 billion over the next 15 years, with over one-third of the funds being earmarked for federal and state acquisition of private property. Another third is designated for 35 coastal states and territories for coastal conservation, fishery management, research, and education. The remainder of the CARA funding is to be spread about to state and local governments for urban parks, recreation facilities, historic preservation, wild-life conservation, and protection of "endangered" species.

In testimony before the House Resources Committee, on June 12, 1999, Karen J. Henry, president of the Wyoming Farm Bureau Federation, rightly noted that "the method of resource management advocated in this legislation has been shown to be an utter failure in the Communist Bloc countries."

President Henry went on to state the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) position on the matter:

Experience has shown that an improving environment is dependent upon economic productivity, and that economic productivity is dependent upon private ownership of the means of production. Because we view land as a means of production, we are concerned that over one-third of the land in this nation is owned by the federal government.

Increasing federal land acquisitions and federal land use regulations are inimical to economic productivity and resultant environmental improvements. We oppose further expansion of federal land ownership, and we support a national policy of no net loss of private lands.

"The claim that government ownership of the land protects the environment can be laid to rest just by going out and looking at the poor environmental condition of land managed solely by the government," Henry continued. "Politics drives the management of these lands, not the needs of the resource; so the management is bound to fail, and the nation loses the resource."

This critical assessment of the federal government's mismanagement of existing federal lands is supported by many of the government's own reports. The appalling mismanagement of the national forests is a striking case in point. According to a detailed report issued by the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) in April 1999, entitled Catastrophic Wildfire Threats, "39 million acres on national forests in the interior West are at high risk of catastrophic wildfire" due to Forest Service policies that have fostered unnatural and excessive tree density, massive buildup of undergrowth, disease, and insect infestation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Locking Up Our Lands
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.