Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Public Administration Research from a Practitioner Perspective

By Streib, Gregory; Slotkin, Bert J. et al. | Public Administration Review, September 2001 | Go to article overview

Public Administration Research from a Practitioner Perspective


Streib, Gregory, Slotkin, Bert J., Rivera, Mark, Public Administration Review


In recent years, a number at authors nave studied me accumulated works of public administration scholars. This series began with research on public management conducted by Garson and Overman (1983). Since this time, an impressive body of literature has developed that examines and debates the quality and nature of research in the field. The work of doctoral students has received a great deal of attention, for example. Dissertation abstracts have been examined (Cleary 1992; McCurdy and Cleary 1984; White 1986b), as well as the productivity of doctoral program graduates (Brewer et al. 1999). Researchers have also studied the research methodologies used in Public Administration Review (Perry and Kraemer 1986; Stallings and Ferris 1988) and other public administration journals (Houston and Delevan 1990). The topics addressed in PAR also received scrutiny (Bingham and Bowen 1994; Watson and Montjoy 1991).

These empirical studies renewed interest in an old debate about research standards in the field (Adams 1992). A criticism that has emerged from recent studies is that public administration research lacks theory building and proposition testing, cumulative research, and rigorous research methods. While such critiques have offered some important insights, they have tended to press a decidedly academic research agenda, raising questions about the future role of practice in the field of public administration. Indeed, some recent critics have called directly for a break with practice. Stallings (1986), for example, advises that doctoral research needs to rise above the "individual and particular problems of day-to-day practical administration" (239). Stallings and Ferris (1988) maintain that public administration has been clinging to a practitioner focus to justify its existence in higher education, and Houston and Delevan (1990) argue that this behavior has hindered the field's intellectual development. These comments raise a serious concern, given that practice is, in many ways, the very soul of the field. Researchers have been drawn to public administration since the early 1900s out of a desire to address the problems of government and society.

Of course, this ongoing debate has not been totally one sided. Authors such as White (1986a) and Box (1992) defend practitioner-oriented research, and they have helped clarify the types of knowledge that practicing administrators need. These authors define approaches to public administration research that contribute to a dynamic, enduring knowledge base that is relevant to practitioners. One thing their arguments lack, however, is a discussion of the types of topics that need to be covered. We now have a better idea of what types of research can contribute, but we know very little about the specific knowledge needs of practicing managers.

In this article, we examine research in public administration from the perspective of an important group of practitioners. Many researchers have considered the field from an academic perspective, and we want to look at another side of the story. McCurdy and Cleary (1984) make some interesting points in defending their critique of public administration dissertations. They contrast research in public administration with medicine, and note that medical practitioners "await new findings in the New England Journal of Medicine (or can be sued for malpractice if they do not keep up)" (554). Achieving this level of relevance requires both a rich body of skillfully conducted academic research and strong linkages between academics and practitioners. Understanding the current state of this linkage is the first step toward achieving this goal.

Practices for Effective Local Government Management

The "Practices for Effective Local Government Management," developed by members of the International City/ County Management Association (ICMA), form the foundation of this research effort. These practices represent the best thinking of the city management profession about the knowledge and skills required of an effective local government manager.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Public Administration Research from a Practitioner Perspective
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.