Beyond Joint and Nuclear: The Indian Family Revisited [*]

By D'cruz, Premilla; Bharat, Shalini | Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Spring 2001 | Go to article overview

Beyond Joint and Nuclear: The Indian Family Revisited [*]


D'cruz, Premilla, Bharat, Shalini, Journal of Comparative Family Studies


PREMIILLA D'CRUZ [**]

SHALINI BHARAT [**]

The systematic study of the family in India dates back to the 1940s. The works of M.N. Srinivas (1942) and M.N. Banerjee (1944-45) appear to be the earliest published materials (See Bharat & Desai, 1995 for a comprehensive bibliography). Family research in India has, by and large, been a study of family patterns (Bharat, 1994), rather than of family dynamics (Uberoi, 1998), and its course can be chartered through a number of distinct phases, each phase being dominated by specific themes and questions (Oommen, 1991). It is this evolution of family research in India that is responsible for the genesis and perpetuation of the belief that the Indian family was essentially joint, and that following industrialisation and urbanisation, it has been replaced by the nuclear family. Thus, though family plurality has been an essential feature of Indian society, biases in research impeded the early recognition of this truth, making it appear to be a recent phenomenon. The present paper dispels myths and misconceptions re garding the family in India. Its description of the multiplicity of family forms simultaneously present in the country is enriched by the incorporation of available research on family dynamics and processes. It is important to note at the outset that the review of research presented herein is organised in terms of chronological phases. Though initially this may appear to underplay or even deny the plurality of family forms in India, the approach is adopted to facilitate an appreciation of how family research in India has evolved.

FAMILY RESEARCH IN THE INDOLOGICAL PHASE

Though the family in India is one of the three most important social institutions for understanding Indian society (Karve, 1953), research on the family in India began sometime in the 1940s with the indological studies of ancient Hindu texts. These provided a normative view of the Indian family (Oommen, 1991). The works of Kapadia (1966), Karve (1953) and Prabhu (1958) illustrate the indological approach, followed by a similar description of the Indian family in the subsequent works of Gore (1965, 1968), Gupta (1978) and Ross (1961) among others.

In the works of the indologists, the joint family is portrayed as the characteristic feature of Indian society (Gore, 1968; Mandelbaum, 1959). Karve (1953:10) defines the joint family as "a group of people who generally live under one roof, who eat food cooked at one hearth, who hold property in common, who participate in common family worship, and who are related to each other as some particular type of kindred".

The essence of the joint family, as brought out in the works of Gore (1965, 1968) and Ross (1961), is described in the following section. The internal Organisation of the joint family, in terms of its structure, comprises a couple, their unmarried children as well as their married sons and their families. Variations along fraternal and familial lines do exist for a variety of reasons including developmental factors in the family life cycle. It is possible to look at the joint family as a multiplicity of genealogically related nuclear families living under one roof and sharing in worship, food and property. However, such a conceptualisation, besides failing to capture the essence of the joint family, living under the control of one patriarch, lays undue and unwarranted emphasis on the conjugal relationship. Looking at the joint family as a group of adult male coparceners and their dependents is more fruitful and realistic, in that it allows for an accurate comprehension of the importance of patrilineality and of familial and fraternal relationships. Additionally, it minimises the spousal and parent-child relationships, which, it is argued, facilitate the stability of the joint family.

As far as the relations in the joint family are concerned, system maintenance being of prime importance, familial and fraternal bonds are encouraged. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Beyond Joint and Nuclear: The Indian Family Revisited [*]
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.