Affirmative Action Issue in College Admissions Grows Murkier

By Lords, Erik | Black Issues in Higher Education, September 27, 2001 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Affirmative Action Issue in College Admissions Grows Murkier

Lords, Erik, Black Issues in Higher Education

Michigan supporters plan national march, rally to increase visibility


The issue of affirmative action in college admissions continues to make headlines as a recent ruling adds to the growing set of conflicting court decisions, and affirmative action supporters plan a national march.

In a unanimous ruling, a Georgia federal appeals court panel determined last month that the admissions policy of the University of Georgia is unconstitutional because it gives a slight preference in bonus points to non-White applicants. The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit unanimously upheld the decision of a lower court ruling that favored three White women who were denied admission in 1999.

In addition to condemning Georgia's admissions policy, the court also questioned whether the Supreme Court's 1978 landmark ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, provides adequate justification for using race in admissions decisions. For more than two decades, the Bakke case has guided most colleges' affirmative action policies.

The conflicting decisions have caused some institutions to re-evaluate their race-related policies and programs. The University of Florida, for instance, announced last month that it will no longer award scholarships based on race. According to a university official, the school will immediately begin revising more than 50 minority scholarship programs to make them race neutral.

In the next few months, however, attention will turn again to the University of Michigan where two of the nation's most closely watched affirmative action lawsuits faded out of the public spotlight this summer as lawyers quietly worked on appeals. But on Oct. 23, the two cases will shift back to center stage when the U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati begins hearing oral arguments. The next stop for one or both of the cases could be the U.S. Supreme Court.

The appeals court in Cincinnati is expected to deal with conflicting rulings by two U.S. district judges. In December 2000, Judge Patrick Duggan ruled without a trial and granted summary judgment in the university's favor in a case involving the school's undergraduate admissions policies. He found that the pursuit of the educational benefits of diversity is a compelling governmental interest, and that U-M's current admissions policy is fully constitutional.

Three months later in the same courthouse, Judge Bernard Friedman issued a decision finding that the educational benefits of diversity were not a compelling interest and that the specifics of the law school's policy were not "narrowly tailored" to that interest. He also found that the intervenors' defense was based on remedying societal discrimination, which is impermissible (see Black Issues, April 26).

Friedman issued an order that the law school cease considering race in its admissions process.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Affirmative Action Issue in College Admissions Grows Murkier


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?