When Calling Hogs Is Your Calling: Neither Terrorist Attacks on the U.S. Homeland nor a Declining Economy Has Deterred Congress from Proposing More Spending Than Ever on Pet Projects. (Nation: Federal Budget)

By Cherry, Sheila R. | Insight on the News, November 26, 2001 | Go to article overview

When Calling Hogs Is Your Calling: Neither Terrorist Attacks on the U.S. Homeland nor a Declining Economy Has Deterred Congress from Proposing More Spending Than Ever on Pet Projects. (Nation: Federal Budget)


Cherry, Sheila R., Insight on the News


Stand very quietly on Capitol Hill these days and you can hear the cacophony of squeals as porked-up legislation disguised as "disaster relief" and "economic stimulus" heads for the federal trough. Coming so close behind the worst terrorist attacks in U.S. history, it is causing even fellow partisans to wince.

Last year's herd of pork weighed in at about $18 billion, Capitol Hill number crunchers estimate. So far this year, they are tracking more than $80 billion in corporate welfare alone.

With the White House distracted by military action in Afghanistan and anthrax scares at home, Congress is responding to economic fallout from the terrorist attacks with subsidies, spending and tax adjustments.

Arguing for the Economic Security and Recovery Act of 2001 (HR3090), its sponsor, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Bill Thomas (R-Calif.), admitted that it was not a perfect tax bill. But, he added, "It isn't intended to be, because that is not what the country needs right now. What it needs is a true fiscal stimulus."

If the theories of liberal economist John Maynard Keynes were dead, say spending critics, these guys have resurrected him. Fiscal watchdogs argue that government intervention rarely stimulates an economy. "How did Congress get out of deficit spending?" asks Sean Rushton, spokesman for Citizens Against Government Waste (CAGW). The answer: compounded economic growth. "Government spending went up," he points out, "but the economy (i.e. tax revenue) grew faster."

For years CAGW has argued that outdated and duplicative programs, fraud, mismanagement and waste in federal agencies estimated at approximately $1.2 trillion have plagued the nation. As a sign of good faith, Rushton says, Congress should redirect every cent of this year's unauthorized porcine earmarks -- estimated at $20 billion -- into defense, intelligence and emergency cleanup spending. "To do otherwise ... is a scandal during a time of national emergency," says the CAGW spokesman. "There comes a point where it seems like [Congress is] profiteering on this tragedy," says Rushton, a one-time aide to former congressman Bill Archer (R-Texas), Thomas' predecessor as House Ways and Means Committee chairman. CAGW is bracing for an official tally of post-Sept. 11 spending proposals it estimates will reach $330.03 billion if all the authorized, requested and proposed spending is enacted.

The CAGW is one of a coalition of antiwaste groups sniffing through the federal truffle patch to track the goodies. That's not an easy task. While pleas and proposals for federal dollars swirl throughout Capitol Hill, little in the way of explaining who ultimately will get what is being committed to the public record. The only thing slowing the porkfest has been the occasional anthrax alert.

Most of the proposed spending in the current packages is for immediate outlays, Rushton advises, but there are rolling subsidies that are destined to be paid over time. "Government is going to be spending [Sept. 11 emergency] money for decades," he laments.

The taxpayer-advocacy groups are hoping that Office of Management and Budget Director Mitchell Daniels will be the fire wall between pie-in-the-sky spending proposals and actual appropriated reality. "We think a lot of him generally," Rushton says. "The message he has consistently sent through the press has been, `Take spending slow.'"

But House Democrats have a laundry list of constituencies they also want to ply with federal programs and their substitute package includes proposals to extend expiring tax provisions such as the welfare-to-work and work-opportunity tax credits, and to provide $11 billion in interest-free financing for school construction. Many of their constituencies and pet programs were left out of the Thomas bill, so House Democrats are appealing to colleagues in the Senate to add to the spending juggernaut that squeaked out of the House on a 216-214 vote. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

When Calling Hogs Is Your Calling: Neither Terrorist Attacks on the U.S. Homeland nor a Declining Economy Has Deterred Congress from Proposing More Spending Than Ever on Pet Projects. (Nation: Federal Budget)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.